|
Catalog Number UNKNOWN |
Device Problem
Structural Problem (2506)
|
Patient Problems
Abdominal Pain (1685); Chest Pain (1776); Dyspnea (1816); Perforation of Vessels (2135); Discomfort (2330); Depression (2361); Cognitive Changes (2551); Cramp(s) /Muscle Spasm(s) (4521)
|
Event Type
Injury
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Non-healthcare professional.Investigation: the following allegations have been investigated: vena cava (vc) perforation.The reported allegations have been further investigated based on the information provided to date.Filter interacts with ivc wall, e.G.Penetration/perforation/embedment.This may be either symptomatic or asymptomatic.Potential causes may include improper deployment; and (or) excessive force or manipulations near an in-situ filter (e.G., a surgical or endovascular procedure in the vicinity of a filter).Potential adverse events that may occur include, but are not limited to, the following: trauma to adjacent structures, vascular trauma, vena cava perforation, vena cava penetration.Catalog number and lot number are unknown.No evidence to suggest that this device was not manufactured according to specifications and nothing indicates that the filter did not perform as intended, e.G.Intended for the prevention of recurrent pulmonary embolism (pe) via placement in the vena cava.Cook will reopen its investigation if further information is received warranting supplementation in accordance with 21 c.F.R.803.56.
|
|
Event Description
|
The following information is alleged: the patient received a cook celect on (b)(6) 2014.The patient's inferior vena cava (ivc) filter since its implantation has three of the four primary struts perforating the caval wall with the perforating anterior strut impinges directly on the posterior wall of overlying duodenum.Hospital and medical records have been requested, but not yet provided.
|
|
Event Description
|
Patient allegedly received an implant on (b)(6) 2014 due to deep vein thrombosis (dvt) developed after hernia mesh implant surgery.The patient alleged vena cava perforation with a strut impinging on the duodenum.The patient further alleged shortness of breath, chest pain, impaired cognitive function, abdominal pain, internal discomfort, cramps and depression.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Investigation the following allegations have been investigated: sob, chest/abdominal pain, impaired cognitive function, internal discomfort, cramps, depression.Investigation is reopened due to additional information provided.The reported allegations have been further investigated based on the information provided to date.Unknown if the reported shortness of breath (sob), chest/abdominal pain, impaired cognitive function, internal discomfort, cramps and depression are directly related to the filter and unable to identify a corresponding failure mode at this point in time.Catalog number and lot number are unknown; however, the alleged celect is manufactured and inspected according to controls.No evidence to suggest that this device was not manufactured according to specifications and nothing indicates that the filter did not perform as intended, e.G.Intended for the prevention of recurrent pulmonary embolism (pe) via placement in the vena cava.Cook will reopen its investigation if further information is received warranting supplementation in accordance with 21 c.F.R.803.56.This report includes information known at this time.A follow-up medwatch report will be submitted if additional relevant information becomes available.This report is required by the fda under 21 cfr part 803.This report is based on unconfirmed information submitted by others.Neither the submission of this report nor any statement made in it is intended to be an admission that any cook device is defective or malfunctioned, that a death or serious injury occurred, or that any cook device caused or contributed to or is likely to cause or contribute to a death or serious injury if a malfunction occurred.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Investigation: investigation is reopened due to additional information provided.Per quality engineering review, the additional information provided for this complaint does not change the previous investigation conclusion.Therefore, no new investigation activities will be conducted at this time.Catalog number and lot number are unknown; however, the alleged filter is manufactured and inspected according to controls.No evidence to suggest that this device was not manufactured according to specifications and nothing indicates that the filter did not perform as intended, e.G.Intended for the prevention of recurrent pulmonary embolism (pe) via placement in the vena cava.Cook will reopen its investigation if further information is received warranting supplementation in accordance with 21 c.F.R.803.56.This report includes information known at this time.A follow-up medwatch report will be submitted if additional relevant information becomes available.This report is required by the fda under 21 cfr part 803.This report is based on unconfirmed information submitted by others.Neither the submission of this report nor any statement made in it is intended to be an admission that any cook device is defective or malfunctioned, that a death or serious injury occurred, or that any cook device caused or contributed to or is likely to cause or contribute to a death or serious injury if a malfunction occurred.
|
|
Event Description
|
Per a report from medical opinion; ¿the patient¿s ivc filter is a cook celect retrievable ivc filter deployed in the infrarenal ivc at the l1-2 level.The filter apex/hook is positioned at the renal vein confluence.The patient¿s cava was normal in course and caliber (16mm) and free of clot at the time of filter deployment.The filter was not tilted on the immediate post-deployment 2014 images, and no clinically significant tilt is apparent on the 2015 ct studies.All four (4) of the primary struts (legs) perforate the caval wall by a distance of 3 mm or greater on the 2015 ct studies.The perforating anterior strut impinges directly on the posterior wall of overlying duodenum.No strut fractures, missing components, caval thrombosis, wall thickening or pericaval hemorrhage were present in 2015.Extensive post-operative changes are present in the lumbar region consistent with the patient¿s surgical history.¿.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|