It was reported through the litigation process that a vena cava filter was placed in a patient after being diagnosed with deep vein thrombosis.After some time post filter deployment, it was alleged that the filter struts perforated.The device has been removed percutaneously.The patient had surgery for perforated duodenum.However, the current status of the patient is unknown.
|
Manufacturing review: the device history records have been reviewed and this lot met all release criteria.There was nothing found to indicate there was a manufacturing related cause for this event.Investigation summary: the device was not returned for evaluation.Medical records were provided and reviewed.After post filter deployment, patient presents with filter caval perforation and filter legs are within the renal hilum.Recently the patient had surgery for perforated duodenum.Approximately six years and ten months later, the patient presented for filter removal, the right internal jugular vein was percutaneously accessed with a micro-puncture set.A wire was advanced under fluoroscopic guidance into the inferior vena cava.Serial dilatations were performed over the wire to accommodate placement of the filter retrieval sheath.The sheath was advanced beyond the filter into the distal and inferior vena cava.Inferior vena cava gram revealed no evidence of thrombus within the filter.Next using a goose neck snare, the retrieval hook was grasped.The sheath was then used to collapse the filter and removed in its entirety.Therefore, the investigation is confirmed for the alleged perforation of the inferior vena cava (ivc).The definitive root cause could not be determined based upon available information.Labeling review: the review of the instructions for use, indications, warnings, precautions, cautions, possible complications, and contraindications showed that the product labeling is adequate.Expiry date: 09/2012 section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
|
It was reported through the litigation process that a vena cava filter was placed in a patient after being diagnosed with deep vein thrombosis.After some time post filter deployment, it was alleged that the filter struts perforated.The device has been removed percutaneously.The patient had surgery for perforated duodenum.However, the current status of the patient is unknown.
|