A physician reported the certas valve was implanted to a (b)(6) year old female patient via v-p shunt on (b)(6) 2020 with setting 4.The course went well after the operation, but in (b)(6) 2020, the patient presented with memory impairment and the setting was changed to 3 with no improvement, and even though the setting was changed to setting 1 in (b)(6) 2021, there were no improvement in symptoms.It was suspected a shunt dysfunction, therefore, the valve was removed and replaced (left side) on (b)(6) 2021.An intraoperative finding confirmed patency of ventricular and abdominal cavities.It was suspected that the valve was obstructed.
|
The certas valve was returned for evaluation.Failure analysis: the position of the cam when valve was received was at setting 6.The valve was visually inspected; needle holes in the needle chamber were noted as well as scratch marks in the silicone housing.The valve was hydrated.The valve was leak tested and only leaked from the needle hole in the needle chamber.The valve passed the test for programming, occlusion, reflux, siphon guard and pressure.No root cause could be determined as the technician could not confirm any problem with the valve at the time of investigation.The possible root cause for the issue reported by the customer was probably due to biological debris and protein build up interfering with the valve mechanism, at the time of investigation no obstruction was noted.
|