|
Reported event: an event regarding crack/fracture involving an exeter stem was reported.The event was confirmed through visual inspection of the returned device and clinician review of the provided medical records.Method & results: -product evaluation and results: visual inspection of the returned device showed that the stem has fractured just below the trunnion.Material analysis: visual inspection of the returned device showed that the stem has fractured just below the trunnion and away from any interaction with the femoral head.It was reported in the event that the patient suffered a fall.The fracture of the device is consistent with a fall and therefore, no further material analysis is required at this time.-clinician review: a review of the provided medical records by a clinical consultant stated the following comment: re pi which is from australia and represents a (b)(6) patient described as 188 cm tall and weighing 103 kg whose date of implantation is listed as (b)(6) 2009 and explantation (b)(6) 2021.The event description states: ".X-ray showed.Right femoral stem.In 2 pieces.#3 cemented exeter.Replaced with another.Into existing cement mantle." (b)(6) 2009 brief operative report: right thr.Diagnosis osteoarthritis right hip.Cemented #3 exeter.36/+5 head, uncemented 66 cluster trident cup.Flat liner." uncomplicated surgery.Undated x-ray : ap pelvis - bilateral hybrid tha left reduced and nominal, right displaced transverse fracture of prosthetic stem at base of trunnion with prosthetic head remaining in acetabular component.No clinical or pmh, no revision operative report, no dated serial x-rays, no examination of explanted components.Based upon the x-ray provided, the event description appears to be confirmed, but insufficient data is available to create a medical report for this case.-device history review: could not be performed as lot code information was not provided.-complaint history review: could not be performed as lot code information was not provided.Conclusion: visual inspection of the returned device showed that the stem has fractured just below the trunnion and away from any interaction with the femoral head.It was reported in the event that the patient suffered a fall.The fracture of the device is consistent with a fall and therefore, no further material analysis is required at this time.A review of the provided medical records by a clinical consultant stated the following comment: re pi which is from australia and represents a (b)(6) patient described as 188 cm tall and weighing 103 kg whose date of implantation is listed as (b)(6) 2009 and explantation (b)(6) 2021.The event description states: ".X-ray showed.Right femoral stem.In 2 pieces.#3 cemented exeter.Replaced with another.Into existing cement mantle." (b)(6) 2009 brief operative report: right thr.Diagnosis osteoarthritis right hip.Cemented #3 exeter.36/+5 head, uncemented 66 cluster trident cup.Flat liner." uncomplicated surgery.Undated x-ray : ap pelvis - bilateral hybrid tha left reduced and nominal, right displaced transverse fracture of prosthetic stem at base of trunnion with prosthetic head remaining in acetabular component.No clinical or pmh, no revision operative report, no dated serial x-rays, no examination of explanted components.Based upon the x-ray provided, the event description appears to be confirmed, but insufficient data is available to create a medical report for this case.No further investigation is required at this time.If additional information becomes available to indicate further evaluation is warranted, this record will be reopened.
|