|
It was reported that, after a (b)(6) years old thr, a revision surgery was performed due to extensive poly wear.Surgeon performed a standard posterior approach as per surgical technique also a debriment of the affected tissue.Metalosis was found.The zirc 12/14 fem hd 28 + 4 and ref lnr 28id 20 deg sz f were explanted and exchange for new poly and head.Patient outcome is unknown.
|
|
The device, used in treatment, was not returned for evaluation but the pictures were reviewed, and the failure mode was confirmed.The clinical/medical investigation concluded that, based on the documentation provided, the root cause of the revision after more than 20 years post implantation was extensive poly ¿age related wear¿ resulting in the eccentric positioning of the femoral head within the acetabular construct reportedly with intraop findings of metallosis.Poly wear after 20 years plus in-vivo would not be an unanticipated finding.Patient symptoms and date of onset was not provided; however, the x-ray and photo provided which appear to support the complaint suggests a lengthy degradation process.The patient impact beyond the reported findings and revision procedure could not be determined.No further medical assessment could be rendered at this time.Should additional clinical documentation become available in the future, the clinical/medical task may be re-evaluated.A review of complaint history did not reveal additional complaints for the listed batch.A review of the risk management file and instructions for use documents revealed this failure mode was previously identified.At this time, we have no reason to suspect that the product failed to meet any product specifications at the time of manufacture.Potential causes could include but are not limited to friction, joint tightness, lifetime of device, damaged product or implant corrosion.The available information in the clinical/medical evaluation states that the root cause of the revision was extensive poly age related wear, therefore, a device history records review for this incident is considered unnecessary.Based on this investigation, the need for corrective action is not indicated.Should the device or additional information be received, the complaint will be reopened.No further investigation is warranted for this complaint; however, we will continue to monitor for future complaints and investigate as necessary.We consider this investigation closed.
|