|
H10: the file was reassessed for reportability and determined to be no longer reportable.Since an initial mdr was submitted, therefore, the file will remain assessed as a malfunction.H10: manufacturing review: the device history records have been reviewed and this lot met all release criteria.There was nothing found to indicate there was a manufacturing related cause for this event.Investigation summary: one peel-apart sheath with vessel dilator were returned for evaluation.Visual, microscopic visual and functional evaluation were performed on the returned device.The investigation is confirmed for the identified deformation issue as the distal tip of the dilator was frayed and the distal end of the peel-apart sheath appeared damaged.However, the investigation is inconclusive for the reported failure to advance as the exact circumstances at the time of the reported events are unknown.A definitive root cause could not be determined based upon the available information.Labeling review: a review of product labeling documentation (e.G., procedural instructions, indications, warnings, precautions, cautions, possible complications, contraindications, nursing guide, and unit label) did not find any product labeling inadequacy.H10: d4(expiry date: 05/2023), g3, h6 (method).H11: b5, h6 (device, result, conclusion).H11:section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.H3 other text : see h10.
|