As the lot number for the device was not provided, a review of the device history record could not be performed.The return of the sample is pending.However, a photo was provided for review.The investigation of the reported event is currently underway.(expiry date: 04/2022).
|
H10: manufacturing review: a complaint history review was performed.This is the second complaint reported for this lot number and the lot met all release criteria.A device history record review is required.Investigation summary: the sample was not returned for evaluation.One electronic photo was provided for review.The investigation is inconclusive for the reported guidewire too rigid and sharp issues, as the device was not returned for evaluation and tissue fragment was found at the j-tip of the guidewire.No other anomalies were noted on the guidewire in the provided photo.A definitive root cause could not be determined based on the available information.Labeling review: a review of product labeling documentation (e.G.Procedural instructions, indications, warnings, precautions, cautions, possible complications, contraindications, nursing guide, and unit label) did not find any product labeling inadequacy.H10: d4 (expiry date: 04/2022), g3, h6 (method).H11: section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant/reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
|