No conclusions can be made.The patient's attorney alleges adverse patient outcome associated with the hernia mesh used to treat the patient.The patient's attorney alleges that the patient had subsequent surgical intervention; however, no details have been provided.No lot number has been provided; therefore, a review of the manufacturing records is not possible.This emdr represents the bard/davol ventralight st mesh (device #4).Additional emdrs were submitted to represent the two bard/davol 3dmax meshes (device #1 & device #2) and the bard/davol ventralex st (device #3).Should additional information be provided, a supplemental emdr will be submitted.Not returned.
|
Attorney alleges that the patient underwent surgery for implant of unspecified bard/davol 3dmax mesh (x2), ventralex st patch and ventralight st on (b)(6) 2019.As reported, the patient is making a claim for an adverse patient outcome against all the devices.It is alleged that the patient had subsequent surgical intervention due to the hernia mesh device.Attorney alleges that the patient experienced emotional distress and the device was defective.
|