This is filed to report the perforation worsened during use of the steerable guide catheter.It was reported this was a mitraclip procedure performed to treat mixed mitral regurgitation (mr) grade 4.When gaining access, the needle that was used perforated the artery.When the steerable guide catheter (sgc) was advanced, the perforation in the artery worsened.The clip delivery system (cds) were advanced.Clip deployment was started; however, after retracting the lock line about 6-7mm, the lock line was stuck inside the handle.After pulling on the lock line several times, the lock line was able to be removed.The clip was implanted, reducing mr to 2-3.The cds was removed and examined.There were no knots or kinks on the line.Upon removal of the device from the groin; a hematoma was observed as a result from the perforation.The hematoma was treated surgically.Hospitalization was prolonged due to the surgical treatment of the artery.No additional information was provided.
|
The device was not returned for analysis.A review of the lot history record identified no manufacturing nonconformities issued to the reported lot.The reported patient effects of perforation and hematoma as listed in the mitraclip g4 system instructions for use (ifu), are known possible complications associated with mitraclip procedures.Based on this information, the reported perforation was due to procedural conditions as the needle that was used to gain access created the perforation and the sgc insertion worsened it.The reported hematoma was a result of the reported perforation.The reported surgical intervention (minor surgery) and delay to therapy/treatment were a result of case specific circumstances as the hematoma was treated surgically and the hospitalization was prolonged due to the surgical treatment of the artery respectively.There is no indication of a product issue with respect to manufacture, design or labeling.
|