• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: ADVANCED BIONICS, LLC HIRES 90K¿ IMPLANT; COCHLEAR IMPLANT

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

ADVANCED BIONICS, LLC HIRES 90K¿ IMPLANT; COCHLEAR IMPLANT Back to Search Results
Model Number CI-1400-01
Medical Device Problem Codes Electrical /Electronic Property Problem (1198); Electrostatic Discharge (2149)
Health Effect - Clinical Codes Undesired Nerve Stimulation (1980); Pain (1994)
Date of Event 03/16/2021
Type of Reportable Event Malfunction
Event or Problem Description
The recipient reportedly experienced an electrostatic discharge (esd) event.The recipient presents with pain and non-auditory sensations.Programming adjustments were made, however, the issue did not resolve.Device testing revealed abnormal results.Revision surgery will be scheduled.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
The recipient's device was explanted.The recipient was reimplanted with another advanced bionics cochlear device.Disclaimer: advanced bionics does not intend that this report be any admission of liability, fault or product defect.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Additional information: section d.9.Disclaimer: advanced bionics does not intend that this report be any admission of liability, fault or product defect.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
The recipient's pain reportedly resolved.Disclaimer: advanced bionics does not intend that this report be any admission of liability, fault or product defect.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Advanced bionics considers the investigation into this reportable event as closed.The external visual inspection revealed tool damage to the top and bottom covers, and cuts to the electrode.These are believed to have occurred during revision surgery.The photographic imaging inspection revealed cut electrode wires in the electrode.This is believed to have occurred during revision surgery.System lock was verified.The device passed some of the electrical tests performed.The device passed the mechanical tests performed.The failure of this device is believed to be attributed to a short from a power node to the case ground at the analog chip.It is believed that electrostatic discharge (esd) led to an overload voltage, damaging structures on case ground node inside the analog integrated circuit.This ultimately caused the device to cease functioning normally.A corrective action was implemented.This version of the hires 90k device is no longer distributed.This is the final report.Disclaimer: advanced bionics does not intend that this report be any admission of liability, fault or product defect.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
HIRES 90K¿ IMPLANT
Common Device Name
COCHLEAR IMPLANT
Manufacturer (Section D)
ADVANCED BIONICS, LLC
28515 westinghouse place
valencia CA 91355
Manufacturer Contact
alexandra gonzalez
28515 westinghouse place
valencia, CA 91355
MDR Report Key11611311
Report Number3006556115-2021-00450
Device Sequence Number17018912
Product Code MCM
UDI-Device Identifier07630016816253
UDI-Public(01)07630016816253(11)151012(17)170930
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter CountryMX
PMA/510(K) Number
P960058
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Device Implanted Year2016
Device Explanted Year2021
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)N
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Foreign,Health Professional
Initial Reporter Occupation Other Health Care Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup,Followup,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 03/16/2021
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Lay User/Patient
Device Expiration Date09/30/2017
Device Model NumberCI-1400-01
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer11/08/2021
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer Not provided
Supplement Date Received by ManufacturerNot provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Initial Report FDA Received Date04/02/2021
Supplement Report FDA Received Date09/02/2021
10/03/2021
11/30/2021
06/11/2022
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Yes
Date Device Manufactured10/12/2015
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age12 YR
Patient SexMale
-
-