• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: PENUMBRA, INC. PENUMBRA SYSTEM ACE 68 REPERFUSION CATHETER; NRY

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

PENUMBRA, INC. PENUMBRA SYSTEM ACE 68 REPERFUSION CATHETER; NRY Back to Search Results
Model Number 5MAXACE068KIT
Medical Device Problem Code Break (1069)
Health Effect - Clinical Code No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Date of Event 03/09/2021
Type of Reportable Event Malfunction
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Evaluation of the returned ace68 confirmed that the device was fractured.The fractured catheter was held together by a small piece of polymer and the coil winds.Based on the damage near the fracture site, this catheter break was likely the result of a kink.If the device is forcefully manipulated against resistance or is otherwise mishandled at extreme angles during use, damage such as a kink and subsequent fracture may occur.Penumbra catheters are inspected during in-process inspection and during quality inspection after manufacturing.The manufacturing records for this lot were reviewed and did not reveal any outstanding discrepancies, design, or quality concerns.
 
Event or Problem Description
The patient was undergoing a thrombectomy procedure in the m1 segment of the middle cerebral artery (mca) using a penumbra system ace 68 reperfusion catheter (ace68), velocity delivery microcatheter (velocity), penumbra engine (engine), penumbra engine canister (canister), non-penumbra sheath and guidewire.During the procedure, the physician reached the target location with the ace68.When aspiration was turned on, the ace69 did not appear to be aspirating properly, but there was occasional blood coming back.The physician then removed the ace68 to see if the clot was ingested.At this point, the physician noticed the ace68 had almost broke about 10in from the distal tip but was hanging.Therefore, the ace68 was not used for the remainder of the procedure.The procedure was completed by using a penumbra system 5max reperfusion catheter (5maxc).There was no report of an adverse effect to the patient.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
PENUMBRA SYSTEM ACE 68 REPERFUSION CATHETER
Common Device Name
NRY
Manufacturer (Section D)
PENUMBRA, INC.
one penumbra place
alameda CA 94502
MDR Report Key11620503
Report Number3005168196-2021-00695
Device Sequence Number3262757
Product Code NRY
UDI-Device Identifier00814548016603
UDI-Public00814548016603
Combination Product (Y/N)Y
Initial Reporter StateMO
Initial Reporter CountryUS
PMA/510(K) Number
K161640
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source company representative,health
Initial Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial
Report Date (Section B) 03/10/2021
Report Date (Section F) 01/01/2005
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Expiration Date09/15/2022
Device Model Number5MAXACE068KIT
Device Catalogue Number5MAXACE068KIT
Device Lot NumberF93120
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer03/17/2021
Was the Report Sent to FDA? Yes
Date Report to Manufacturer01/10/2005
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 03/10/2021
Initial Report FDA Received Date04/06/2021
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age70 YR
Date Report Sent to FDA01/01/2005
-
-