|
As the lot number for the device was provided, a review of the device history records is currently being performed.The device has been returned to the manufacturer for evaluation.However, photo was also provided for review.The investigation of the reported event is currently underway.(expiry date: 05/2022).
|
|
Manufacturing review: a manufacturing review was not required as this is the only complaint reported to date for this product and lot.Investigation summary: one photo was reviewed.The photo shows the device which appeared bloody and the strain relief has detached from the catheter and balloon noted be ruptured circumferential and the distal end of the balloon were detached from the catheter.No other anomalies noted.Therefore, based on the photo review, the reported failure balloon rupture and detachment can be confirmed and the reported retraction issues could not be confirmed on the findings no conclusion can be made.One ultraverse 035 pta dilatation catheter in two segments were returned for evaluation.On the visual evaluation of the device, the first segment consists of strain relief and partial catheter.The second segment consist of the remaining catheter and partially detached balloon.The balloon appeared to have circumferential rupture and got detached from the distal end of the catheter.All the anomalies were observed in the microscopic observation.No other anomalies noted.No functional evaluation performed due to the condition of the device, which returned for evaluation.Therefore, the investigation has confirmed for the balloon rupture as the balloon got ruptured circumferentially and got detached from the catheter.The investigation is also confirmed for detachment of device as the device returned in two segments for evaluation.However, the investigation for the reported retraction issue remains inconclusive as the condition of the use could not be replicated and no functional evaluation performed due to the condition of the device, which returned for evaluation.Per the reported event details, the target lesion was highly calcified.Therefore, it is possible the interaction between the lesion and the balloon contributed to the reported balloon rupture.However, the definitive root cause for the reported balloon rupture, detachment of device and retraction issue could not be determined based upon available information.Labeling review: the review of the instructions for use, indications, warnings, precautions, cautions, possible complications, and contraindications showed that the product labeling is adequate.Expiry date: 05/2022.Section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
|