|
The device was not returned for analysis.A review of the lot history record identified no manufacturing nonconformities issued to the reported lot that would have contributed to this event.Additionally, a review of the complaint history identified no other similar incidents reported from this lot.Based on the information provided, the balloon rupture appears to be due to case circumstances.It is likely that the balloon rupture occurred due to interaction with the heavily calcified internal carotid artery.There is no indication of a product quality issue with respect to the design, manufacture, or labeling of the device.Na.
|