|
Balt usa's reference number: (b)(4).Pending on investigation findings from supplier (b)(4).The submission of this report or related information to the fda, and its release by fda, does not reflect a conclusion by the party submitting this report of the fda that the report or related information is an admission that the manufacturer, their employees, or the device caused or contributed to the reportable event.
|
|
Balt usa's reference number: (b)(4).The affected catheter eclipse2l has not been returned to supplier balt extrusion for inspection.As a result, the analysis of the reported event was limited.Conclusion was based on the incident description, device history records, and post-market data.During our review of device history records (dhrs) and process of the eclipse2l, we noted that: the braid, the tube, and the balloon are 100% controlled with a visual inspection during the manufacturing process.A tightness test of the balloon is also performed on every unit per the manufacturing instructions.We did not observe any anomaly that could potentially explain the event described in the dhr.Finally, no similar complaint had been reported for this lot number.The incident description mentioned that the eclipse2l revealed being entrapped into the embolic agent injected("upon completion of the procedure he was attempting to remove the eclipse2l 6x9.The balloon would not come out").This incident type cannot be linked to the device itself since there is not a technical characteristic that could explain the trapping.We do not know the conditions where this issue occurred and which manipulations were applied.However, following the information given by the user, the proximal entrapping of the catheter is due to patient anatomy which caused a contact between embolic agent and catheter ("during the injection there was a "reentry point" from the fistula which allowed some onyx to come in contact with the balloon catheter at a more proximal location (4-5cm proximal)").This entrapping could be also due to specifications of embolic agent used.Finally, following this entrapping the incident description also states that the catheter was broken during his removal.These damages could assuredly be linked with the removal attempts after the device was entrapped within the embolic agent plug: "he pulled pressure and released pressure for approximately 30 minutes until the catheter stretched and broke at approximately 140cm." in conclusion, the incident reported cannot be linked to a potential technical failure of the balloon catheter eclipse2l.Manufacturing records complied to specifications and product was not available for inspection.The trend of this failure mode will continue to be monitored as part of our post-marketing surveillance program review of the lot history records did not reveal any in-process or lot-specific issue that could account for the observation.No additional complaints against lot number f201201045 has been made for the same issue.Comprehensive analysis of this failure mode has remained subject to monitoring for any unacceptable increase in trend.The submission of this report or related information to the fda, and its release by fda, does not reflect a conclusion by the party submitting this report of the fda that the report or related information is an admission that the manufacturer, their employees, or the device caused or contributed to the reportable event.
|