H11: section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.The following were reviewed as part of this investigation: patient severity, applicable previous investigation(s), labeling, sample analysis and applicable fmea documents.Based on a review of this information, the following was concluded: the complaint of low visibility of the catheter was confirmed but the cause is unknown.A single x-ray of the patient¿s chest was returned for evaluation of this complaint.A catheter could be seen in the image but there was low visibility of the catheter and its position.The image was forwarded to a radiologist consultant for further review.The main conclusion from the radiologist was that a picc was visible in the x-ray with the tip of the catheter being at the level of the distal svc.As per the radiologist, the catheter can be seen better with certain techniques and positioning that moves the catheter from overlying the spine.In addition, a portable technique and larger body habitus can be contributing factors that make the picc more difficult to see.The exact cause of the low visibility of the catheter could not be determined but may have been affected by multiple factors including patient position, anatomy of the patient, radiographic technique, and catheter size.H3 other text : evaluation findings are in section h.11.
|