|
Without a lot number the device history records review could not be completed.Product was not returned.Based on the information available, it has been determined that no corrective and/or preventative action is proposed.This complaint will be accounted for and monitored via post market surveillance activities.If additional information is made available, the investigation will be updated as applicable.The investigation could not be completed.No conclusion could be drawn, as no product was received.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
|
Depuy synthes is submitting this report pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which depuy synthes has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by fda, depuy synthes or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, depuy synthes, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.H3, h6: a product investigation was conducted.Visual inspection: the scrdriver t8 self-holding angl w/sleeve (p/n: 03.617.900, lot#: unk) was returned and received.Upon visual inspection, the t8 torx feature is showing a significant amount of "wear" on all 6 lobes of the drive feature.A couple of the lobes shows some minor twisting at their distal ends.All 6 "grooves" at the distal end of the t8 drive feature shows burrs extending beyond the distal end of the driver indicating material drag the universal swivel feature shows minor wear indicating this device was used appropriately.Due to the ¿burrs¿ at the distal end of the grooves in the t8 drive feature, this device has lost its frictional retention ability to hold the screw in a self-retention manner.The wear on the hex lobes will also contribute to the inability to fully tighten the screw into its position.This device has served its useful purpose and should be replaced.The damage was consistent as an end of life indicator for the device.No other issues were identified during the inspection.The received condition was consistent with the complaint condition thus the complaint was confirmed.Conclusion: the overall complaint was confirmed during the investigation as the device's distal tip was stripped and worn out.No other damages were observed on the device.After a visual inspection, it is determined that the reusable instrument device is worn from repeated use and servicing; therefore, further investigation for the reported complaint device is not required.During the investigation, no product design or manufacturing issues were observed that may have contributed to the complaint condition; therefore, further corrective and/or preventative action is not required.Additional monitoring for any potential safety signals will be conducted through complaint trending and other post-market safety surveillance activities.Dhr not performed due to unknown lot number.However, a manufacturing-related potential cause was not suspected, therefore, per franchise complaint product investigation procedure no manufacturing record evaluation is required.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|