| Model Number |
SC-035-135 |
| Medical Device Problem Codes |
Detachment of Device or Device Component (2907); Difficult to Advance (2920)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
Unspecified Tissue Injury (4559)
|
| Date of Event |
04/08/2021
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
Physician was attempting to use trailblazer support catheter along with non-medtronic 6fr sheath and 0.035" guidewire during procedure to treat a severely calcified lesion in the left mid common iliac artery (cia) with 20% stenosis.The vessel was moderately tortuous with 8mm diameter.The vessel was not pre or post dilated.Ifu was followed.It was reported that one segment of the catheter broke with the segment retrieved with snare.The broken part of the trailblazer was retrieved from patient body safely.Physician proceeded to treat.It was reported that access was at right common femoral.Physician was using stiff glidewire and non-medtronic flush catheter to go to contralateral side-left.Once the wire went down into the left common femoral, physician removed the flush catheter and advanced 0.035"x135 trailblazer over the wire.Advancing over iliac bifurcation, there was resistance felt.Once trailblazer was advanced into external/iliac common femoral, the catheter would not track, the physician tried to remove trailblazer catheter leaving wire in its position.When removing trailblazer, physician felt snap and when removed, noticed not the whole catheter was removed.Physician confirmed with angiography that approximately 15cm of catheter was still in the patient on the wire.Physician then advanced another guidewire, positioning next to distal tip of broken trailblazer, it was safely removed from patient.Angiography confirmed that there was no perforation or damage to the vessel as well as no remaining pieces where left inside the patient.No further injury reported.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Device evaluation: a single photograph of the trailblazer support catheter was received for analysis.The photograph is of two segments of the catheter after removal from the patient.The proximal end of the shorter segment is at a radiopaque marker band.Not all of the shorter segment is visible in the image.Per the initial reported event description, approximately 15cm of the catheter embolized in the patient and was successfully removed from the patient.Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Device evaluation the device was returned with the distal section detached from the proximal section.The size indicated on the strain relief 0.035¿ x 135cm is consistent with the reported size in gch.Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|