• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: HOYA CORPORATION PENTAX TOKYO OFFICE PENTAX; VIDEO DUODENOSCOPE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

HOYA CORPORATION PENTAX TOKYO OFFICE PENTAX; VIDEO DUODENOSCOPE Back to Search Results
Model Number ED-3490TK
Medical Device Problem Code Loss of or Failure to Bond (1068)
Health Effect - Clinical Code No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Type of Reportable Event Malfunction
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
International medical device regulators forum (imdrf) adverse event reporting (b)(4).
 
Event or Problem Description
Pentax of america initiated field correction 2017-001-c which included inspection of the seal around the distal body and distal cap of the ed-3490tk duodenoscope pursuant to predefined inspection criteria (et-hf-p-0013 rev.00).The objective of the inspection was to verify there were no defects/discontinuities in the seal between the distal body and distal cap.The inspectional criteria was defined as, "all seal surfaces observed shall be continuous and smooth with no outward signs of discontinuity, gaps or bubbles." a device was considered to fail the inspection if any element of the criteria was not met.The customer owned device was previously returned to pentax medical from the customer on 12-mar-2021 and inspection of the unit was performed under service order (b(4) where the quality control inspector documented the following codes on 15-mar-2021: distal cap - fixed type failed seal integrity inspection, primary operation channel resistance, distal cap - fixed type distal tip upgrade, hole in # 1 remote control button cover, hole in # 3 remote control button cover, hole in # 4 remote control button cover, prism scratched, failed dry leak test, image shadows, failed wet leak test, suction tube resistance, prism lens chipped, hole in # 2 remote control button cover, bending rubber pinhole, wrong scope case received.Inspection of the seal between the distal body and distal cap was performed and the device failed the inspection criteria.The endoscop's repairs will include the distal case/cap, which will be replaced and/or resealed pursuant to the field correction, along with the following parts, and returned to the user upon completion: o-rings and seals, air/water tube, deflector operating wire, deflector staycoil, objective prism assy, operation channel, adjusting collar, angle wire, bending rubber, distal case/cap, distal case attaching screw, rl pulley assy, ud pulley assy, remote control button, suction channel lg, o-ring(0.5x1.3) imp-1, gi-90/i10/k10 series cardboard scope case.Model ed-3490tk, serial number (b)(4), has been routinely serviced at a pentax facility since the device was put into service on 30-jun-2015.The endoscope is awaiting repair or approval by final qc as of 14-apr-2021.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
PENTAX
Common Device Name
VIDEO DUODENOSCOPE
Manufacturer (Section D)
HOYA CORPORATION PENTAX TOKYO OFFICE
tsutsujigaoka 1-1-110
akishima-shi, tokyo 196-0 012
JA  196-0012
MDR Report Key11666038
Report Number9610877-2021-00044
Device Sequence Number14186865
Product Code FDT
UDI-Device Identifier04961333229611
UDI-Public04961333229611
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter StateMO
Initial Reporter CountryUS
PMA/510(K) Number
K161222
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)N
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source company representative
Initial Reporter Occupation Other
Remedial Action Recall,Repair,Inspection
Type of Report Initial
Report Date (Section B) 03/15/2021
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device No Information
Device Model NumberED-3490TK
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer03/12/2021
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 03/12/2021
Initial Report FDA Received Date04/14/2021
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
If action reported to FDA under 21 USC 360i(g), list
FDA-assigned Recall Number or include a statement
NOT ISSUED YET
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-