Reported event: an event regarding seizing involving a mig, distal femoral replacement, extension mechanism was reported.The event was confirmed by x ray review.Method & results: device evaluation and results: not performed as product was not returned.Clinician review: a review of the provided x-rays by a clinical consultant indicated: the implant in situ was for a mig distal femoral replacement which was inserted in 2019.The surgeon reported that the implant could not reach the full expansion of 52mm.The x-ray images provided show that from 8th march 2021, 9th march 2021 and 10th march 2021, the extension gaps were measured as 26.5mm, 29.6mm and 26.6mm respectively, which indicated that the implant hasn¿t been extended.The 4mm difference between 8th march and 9th march measurement could be due to the accuracy of the measurement and orientation of the x-rays.Therefore, the radiographic review can confirm that the implant hasn¿t been extended and further investigation is required.Device history review: review of the product history records indicate the device was manufactured and accepted into final stock with no reported discrepancies.Complaint history review: there have been no other events for the lot referenced.Conclusion: on the 22nd of march 2021 the sales rep reported that mig, distal femoral replacement pin 21909 was not reaching the full expansion of 52mm.On 7th of april the sales rep confirmed the patient has undergone a total of five lengthening procedures.The last procedure was on 9th of march 2021 whereby minimal lengthening was achieved and no further extension was possible.The exact cause of the event could not be determined because insufficient information was provided.Additional information including operative reports, pathology reports, progress notes, and return of the device are needed to fully investigate the event.If further information becomes available or the product is returned, this investigation will be re-opened.
|