• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: AESCULAP AG MINOP ANG ENDOSCOPE 30DEG 180MM 2.7MM; NEUROENDOSCOPY

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

AESCULAP AG MINOP ANG ENDOSCOPE 30DEG 180MM 2.7MM; NEUROENDOSCOPY Back to Search Results
Model Number PE204A
Device Problem Product Quality Problem (1506)
Patient Problem No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
Manufacturing site evaluation: investigation on-going.Additional information / investigation results will be provided in a supplemental report.
 
Event Description
It was reported that there was an issue with pe204a - minop ang endoscope 30deg 180mm 2.7mm.According to the complaint description, the two components do not fit together and therefore cannot be used.Both individual parts seemed to have been in proper condition.There are adhesive residue on optics.There was no described patient harm.Additional information was not provided nor available / was not available.The malfunction is filed under aag reference (b)(4).Associated medwatch-reports: 9610612-2021-00327 ((b)(4) + fh620r), 9610612-2021-00326 ((b)(4) + pe204a).
 
Event Description
The malfunction is filed under aag reference (b)(4).
 
Manufacturer Narrative
"investigation results: visual investigation: the investigation was carried out visually and microscopically.A foreign substance can be found on the shaft of the endoscope.Visually, no deviation can be found at the trocar.The foreign substance at the shaft is probably adhesive, most likely caused by an improper montage of the endoscope.Furthermore, the measures of the endoscope has been checked, but partially found to be not according the specification.Therefore the failure described by the customer could be simulated, a montage of the components was not possible.Batch history review: review of the complaint history revealed that no similar complaints have been filed against products from this batch number.The need to revisit the risk assessment will be requested and further evaluated by the responsible department.Conclusion and measures / preventive measures: based upon the investigation results, the root cause of the reported issue can be traced back to a manufacturing-related failure.Specifically, it is assumed that the foreign body, on the shaft of the endoscope is most likely glue.This is not a systematic error.The dimensional deviations are manufacturing errors that have been reported to the manufacturer.A stock clearance has been initiated and the defective products have been sorted out.Based upon the investigations results a capa was initiated - further actions will be documented.Associated medwatch-reports: 9610612-2021-00327 (b)(4) and 9610612-2021-00326 (b)(4).
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Based upon investigation results, this event was re-evaluated and is considered no longer reportable due to risk file- no malfunction or serious injury.Investigation results: visual investigation: a foreign substance can be found on the shaft of the endoscope.Visually, no deviation can be found at the trocar.The foreign substance at the shaft is probably adhesive, most likely caused by an improper montage of the endoscope.Furthermore, the measures of the endoscope has been checked, but partially found to be not according the specification.Therefore the failure described by the customer could be simulated, a montage of the components was not possible.Batch history review: dhr check has been carried out in course the communication with the manufacturer.Review of the complaint history revealed that no similar complaints have been filed against products from this batch number.The review of the risk assessment revealed that the overall risk level (severity 2(5) x probability of occurrence 2(5)) according to din en iso 14971 is no longer acceptable.The need to revisit the risk assessment will be requested and further evaluated by the responsible department.Conclusion and measures / preventive measures: based upon the investigation results, the root cause of the reported issue can be traced back to a manufacturing-related failure.Specifically, it is assumed that the dimensional deviations are a manufacturing defect, which is communicated to the manufacturer and documented in the z2 messages 201974056, 201978630 and 201978631.A stock clearing was initiated and defective products were sorted out.Based upon the investigations results a product safety case (psc) was initiated.Associated medwatch-reports: 9610612-2021-00327 (400508674 + fh620r), 9610612-2021-00326 (400508675 + pe204a).
 
Event Description
The malfunction is filed under aag reference (b)(4).
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
MINOP ANG ENDOSCOPE 30DEG 180MM 2.7MM
Type of Device
NEUROENDOSCOPY
Manufacturer (Section D)
AESCULAP AG
po box 40
tuttlingen, 78501
GM  78501
Manufacturer (Section G)
AESCULAP AG
po box 40
tuttlingen, 78501
GM   78501
Manufacturer Contact
christian von der grün
po box 40
tuttlingen, 78501
GM   78501
MDR Report Key11678920
MDR Text Key245807696
Report Number9610612-2021-00326
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code GWG
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeIT
PMA/PMN Number
K983365
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Foreign,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Other Health Care Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date 11/30/2021
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received04/16/2021
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model NumberPE204A
Device Catalogue NumberPE204A
Device Lot Number4511058926
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Yes
Date Returned to Manufacturer04/06/2021
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received11/03/2021
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured12/05/2019
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Unknown
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-