The reported event was unconfirmed because the reported failure could not be reproduced / device meets specifications.The reported failure is considered within specification as the reported failure could not be reproduced.The product was used for treatment.The product had not caused the reported failure.Visual evaluation of the returned sample noted one opened (without original packaging), used trocar and channel drain.Visual inspection of the sample noted no obvious visible defects or damage that would cause dullness.The trocar seemed to be sharp without any additional abnormality.No root cause could be found because the reported event was unconfirmed.A dhr review was not required as the investigation was unconfirmed.Therefore, no additional action is required at this time.The device was returned for evaluation.The lot number is unknown; therefore, the device history record could not be reviewed.As the reported event is unconfirmed a labeling review is not required.H11: section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.H3 other text : the actual/suspected device was inspected.
|