|
Engineering requested additional information regarding the patient's accident.The sales rep reported the patient was not in an accident; however, the screw just needed to be re-directed.No further information was provided regarding this incident.Review of the manufacturing records was conducted.There are no deviations or ncrs associated with this lot number.The material certs indicated all materials and other specifications were meet prior to releasing into inventory.Visual inspection was conducted on the returned implant.The distal portion of the screw shank appears to be burred by the surgeon (at fracture location) to create a gripping surface to unthread the screw.Not usable in the investigation.Pedicle threads appear normal, no nicks, scratches, or deformation of threads.Gash cut tips are proper with no deformation.The poly motion on the tulip head was normal with no resistance in any plane.No damage to set screw threads.Light and even wear present on both sides of the bushing suggesting normalized and proper rod lockdown.Extended tabs were broken off properly with no signs of damage at the reduction thread zone.There appears to be several instances of damage/scoffing from screw removal after fracture.Failure of the cannulated extended tab screw at the shank neck.Fracture occurred after index surgery.Fracture did not fully dislocate the screw head from the shank and was only partial through neck as indicated by the two-surface finished photographed above.This is consistent with the surgeon stating he observed failure when trying to redirect the screw in the revision surgery.Screw placement, vertebral level, patient size, and post-operative patient activity are all unknown.The root cause for this event is likely user error.Labeling review: "warnings: based on the fatigue test results, the physician/surgeon should consider the levels of implantation, patient weight, patient activity level and patient conditions, which may impact the performance of the system when using this device.Use of these systems is significantly affected by the surgeon's proper patient selection, preoperative planning, proper surgical technique, proper selection and placement of implants." "possible adverse effects: the following complications and adverse reactions have been shown to occur with the use of similar spinal instrumentation.These effects and any other known by the surgeon must be discussed with the patient preoperatively.Initial or delayed loosening, disassembly, bending, dislocation, and/or breakage of device components." "postoperative management: the surgeon should instruct the patient regarding amount and time frame after surgery of any weight bearing activity.The increased risk of bending, dislocation, and/or breakage of the implant devices, as well as an undesired surgical result are consequences of any type of early or excessive weight bearing, vibratory motion, fall, jolts or other movements preventing proper healing and/or fusion development.".
|