|
|
| Catalog Number |
1191530 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Patient-Device Incompatibility (2682)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Codes |
Wound Dehiscence (1154); Abdominal Pain (1685); Purulent Discharge (1812)
|
| Date of Event |
04/02/2021
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
As reported, the patient had a wound opening with phasix mesh exposure one month post-implant.The reported event was clinically assessed to be mild, possibly related to the study device and definitely in relation to the index procedure.As reported, the patients postoperative symptoms are resolving.Pain and wound dehiscence are known inherent risks of surgery and are listed in the instructions-for-use, supplied with the device as possible complications.Based on the information provided, no conclusion can be made.A review of the manufacturing records was performed and found that the lot was manufactured to specification.Should additional information be provided a supplemental mdr will be submitted.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported to davol that a patient who is part of a clinical study experienced a wound opening with phasix mesh exposure.(b)(6) 2021 - the subject patient underwent a whipple procedure (pancreaticoduodenectomy), performed in open fashion.Incisions were made in the mid-upper abdomen.A bard/davol phasix mesh, was trimmed and placed as an onlay.Overlap was achieved and the skin was closed with a non bard/davol, ethicon suture.(b)(6) 2021 - the subject patient experienced a wound opening with phasix mesh exposure.Additionally, the patient has abdominal pain with constant white pus drainage.As reported, the outcome of the adverse event is recovering/resolving.The severity is reported to be mild with no action taken.The reported adverse event has been assessed per clinician as possibly related to the study device and definitely related to the procedure.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported to davol that a patient who is part of a clinical study experienced a wound opening with phasix mesh exposure.(b)(6) 2021- the subject patient underwent a whipple procedure (pancreaticoduodenectomy), performed in open fashion.Incisions were made in the mid-upper abdomen.A bard/davol phasix mesh, was trimmed and placed as an onlay.Overlap was achieved and the skin was closed with a non bard/davol, ethicon suture.(b)(6) 2021 - the subject patient experienced a wound opening with phasix mesh exposure.Additionally, the patient has abdominal pain with constant white pus drainage.As reported, the the outcome of the adverse event is recovering/resolving.The severity is reported to be mild with no action taken.The reported adverse event has been assessed per clinician as possibly related to the study device and definitely related to the procedure.Addendum: (b)(6) 2021 - the initial ae progressed and the subject patient was hospitalized for a 1x1x2cm midline skin dehiscence and a wound vac was placed.(b)(6) 2021 - the patient was discharged.As reported, the ae has been assessed as possibly related to the device and definitely related to the procedure.The event has been assessed as a serious adverse event of mild severity.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
As reported, the patient had a wound opening with phasix mesh exposure one month post-implant.The reported event was clinically assessed to be mild, possibly related to the study device and definitely in relation to the index procedure.As reported, the patients postoperative symptoms are resolving.Pain and wound dehiscence are known inherent risks of surgery and are listed in the instructions-for-use, supplied with the device as possible complications.Based on the information provided, no conclusion can be made.A review of the manufacturing records was performed and found that the lot was manufactured to specification.Addendum: this is an addendum to the initial mdr submitted.This supplemental mdr is submitted to report the additional information received.The additional details provided does not change the initial determination, no conclusion can be made.As reported, the patient required hospitalization for placement of a wound vac and was discharged.The reported event was clinically assessed as a serious adverse event of mild severity and was possibly related to the device and definitely related to the procedure.Should additional information be provided a supplemental mdr will be submitted.Note: section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|