| Model Number |
ZCB00 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
Capsular Bag Tear (2639)
|
| Date of Event |
06/22/2020
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Weight, ethnicity: unknown, not provided.If implanted; explanted; give date: n/a (not applicable).Lens was removed/replaced during the same procedure.All pertinent information available to johnson & johnson surgical vision, inc.Has been submitted.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that after a tecnis monofocal intraocular lens (iol) was implanted in the patient's eye, the surgeon noticed a tear in the capsule bag.The lens was removed and replaced with a model za9003 iol during the same procedure.No additional surgical intervention required.The procedure was completed without further issue.Reportedly, the patient has recovered.No further information is available.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Device evaluation: product evaluation was not performed because the product has not been returned.The complaint issue reported could not be verified and no product deficiency could be identified.Manufacturing record review: the manufacturing process record was evaluated and revealed that the product was manufactured and released according to specifications.A search revealed that no other complaints were received from this production order.Conclusion: as a result of the investigation there is no indication of a product quality deficiency and the reported issue could not be verified.All pertinent information available to johnson & johnson surgical vision, inc.Has been submitted.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Additional information: section d9: device available for evaluation: yes.Section d9: return to manufacturer: 6/9/2021.Section h3: device evaluated by manufacturer: yes.Device evaluation: visual inspection under magnification revealed viscoelastic residue on the optic body and haptics and that the lens was received cut in half, which is consistent with a lens that was handled during removal and replacement.Based on the return condition of the lens, no further product evaluation could be performed.The complaint issue could not be confirmed, and no product deficiency could be identified.Conclusion: as a result of the investigation, there is no indication of a quality product deficiency and the reported issue could not be verified.All pertinent information available to johnson & johnson surgical vision, inc.Has been submitted.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|