• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MEDTRONIC PUERTO RICO OPERATIONS CO. INTELLIS; STIMULATOR, SPINAL-CORD, TOTALLY IMPLANTED FOR PAIN RELIEF

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MEDTRONIC PUERTO RICO OPERATIONS CO. INTELLIS; STIMULATOR, SPINAL-CORD, TOTALLY IMPLANTED FOR PAIN RELIEF Back to Search Results
Model Number 97715
Device Problem Data Problem (3196)
Patient Problem Inadequate Pain Relief (2388)
Event Date 04/09/2021
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Event Description
Information was received from a patient (pt) regarding an implantable neurostimulator (ins).The reason for call was pt stated within the last couple of weeks, 7/10 times when they check the stimulation levels in the morning the intensities of the programs would all be 0.Pt said the stimulation intensity would be normal (not 0) at night, but it would be in the morning that they would notice all 0.Pt said they kept a log of when they recharge, and when they noticed all 0, ins battery would still have some charge (pt did note that the ins battery would still deplete some when intensity was all 0).Pt then said they would try to turn intensity back up, but the stimulation/intensity usually wouldn't turn back up/on until it kicked back on itself (pt confirmed stimulation intensity would turn back on and not be 0 anymore on it's own).Pt had not noticed the issue happening in any certain position or activity.The circumstances that led to the reported issue were asked but unknown.Pt said intensity was all 0 this morning, but a couple hours after they woke up, stimulation kicked back on, so stimulation was working during the call.Pt was on group b, which is what they had been on.Pt went into program 1 and reported seeing icons for intensity, stimulation, and adaptive stim (all of which were on), but no other options.Pss asked, pt said they didn't have cycling programmed in.The issue was not resolved.The patient was redirected to their healthcare provider (hcp) to further address the issue.Pt mentioned their rep text them saying they were going to contact hcp to set up a time to meet with pt to check programming, but suggested pt call patient services first.Pt said the stimulator, since implanted, had helped their upper back, but never helped with their lower back or legs.Pt said they tried programming in the beginning, but could not get it to help lower back.Pt then said rep had pt try group b, and group b worked for the first couple days, but then stopped working for pt's lower back.Pt said their rep now wants to try hd programming to see if that would help.Pt mentioned they were going to meet with rep  again for programming to help with the pt's pain in lower back and down their left leg.The stimulator, since implanted, had helped their upper back, but never helped with their lower back or legs.Pt tried programming in the beginning, but could not get it to help lower back.Pt then said rep (b)(6) had pt try group b, and group b worked for the first couple days, but then stopped working for pt's lower back.Pt said their rep now wants to try hd programming to see if that would help.
 
Event Description
Additional information was received from the manufacturer representative (rep).The cause of stim intensity going to 0 issue was not determined.The issue was not resolved.The rep reprogrammed scs.Additionally it was reviewed that rep should check adaptive stim settings.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Event Description
Additional information was reported that the patient said the ins regularly resets the amplitude to 0.0.Factors related to this are unknown.On last visit interrogation looked normal.Patient reset amplitude values back to suggested for dtm.The issue was not resolved at the time of the report.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
INTELLIS
Type of Device
STIMULATOR, SPINAL-CORD, TOTALLY IMPLANTED FOR PAIN RELIEF
Manufacturer (Section D)
MEDTRONIC PUERTO RICO OPERATIONS CO.
road 31, km. 24, hm 4
ceiba norte industrial park
juncos PR 00777
MDR Report Key11722877
MDR Text Key247320279
Report Number3004209178-2021-06625
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LGW
UDI-Device Identifier00643169781702
UDI-Public00643169781702
Combination Product (y/n)N
PMA/PMN Number
P840001
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,consum
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date 05/12/2021
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received04/26/2021
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date08/28/2019
Device Model Number97715
Device Catalogue Number97715
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Date Manufacturer Received05/11/2021
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age79 YR
-
-