|
|
| Model Number |
20005D |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Codes |
Eye Injury (1845); Appropriate Clinical Signs, Symptoms and Conditions Term/Code Not Available (4581)
|
| Date of Event |
03/29/2021
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
(b)(4).Device evaluation: (b)(6) applications support manager (jnjasm) checked laser as they were on site the day of the event.System gel flaps made hinges as expected (2 times) using doctor¿s login and using engineer¿s login.System settings were then change (reduce energy, reduce pocket depth and modified hinge angle.Jnjasm witnessed flap treatment of the patient¿s left eye with staff.Doctor states this treatment was normal however slightly harder to lift than normal.Based on the surgeon feedback jnjasm returned the energy setting back to prior to the event, but left pocket depth and hinge angle unchanged for the next patients.The rest of the surgery day was normal through 18 more eyes.A review of records related to the device including labeling, complaint trending, and risk documentation will be performed.Upon completion of this review, if there is any further relevant information obtained, a supplemental medwatch will be filed.All pertinent information available to (b)(6) surgical vision, inc has been submitted.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported by the surgeon that on the right eye of the first patient the laser did not appear to treat with hinge, but appeared to be a free cap.Upon further discussion with the surgeon he explained there was so much force at hinge due to bubbles.There is a possibility a vertical gas breakthrough (vgb) occurred.He further stated the laser was serviced last on (b)(6), 2021.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
On (b)(6) 2021, applications support manager, visited the account for surgery support following the event.The account reported, that patient is doing well post-operatively.And have no vision loss.Surgeon used system with no issue.And no change in surgical settings was required.Correction: h4: manufacturing date: the manufacturing site reported, that the manufacturing date for the device is 7/28/2010; additional information: h3: device evaluated by manufacturer? yes; h6: type of investigation codes: 3331, 4110 and 4109/ device evaluation: a review of the records, related to this equipment that included labeling, manual, trending, and risk documentation reviews for this equipment were performed.Equipment labeling provides possible complications, that can be caused by the surgical/treatment procedure being performed.The trend review shows, that there is not a recognizable adverse trend.The risks and mitigations associated with the complaint issue are identified, in existing risk documents.And no new risks were identified as part of this investigation.There was no product deficiency identified.All pertinent information available to johnson & johnson surgical vision, inc.Has been submitted.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|