|
H.6.Investigation: scope of issue: the scope of issue is only limited to facslyric 3l8c instrument us, part #662877 and serial # (b)(6).Problem statement: customer reported a complaint of a carryover issue.Manufacturing defect trend: there are zero qns (quality notifications) related to the reported issue.Date range from 30mar2020 to 30mar2021.Complaint trend: there is 1 complaint related to the carryover issue.Date range from 30mar2020 to 30mar2021.Manufacturing device history record (dhr) review: dhr part # 662877 serial # (b)(6), file # 662877-662877-z662877000008-106309525-19, was reviewed.The instrument met all the manufacturing specifications prior to release.Investigation result / analysis: the investigation was performed and based on the review of the complaint trend, defect trend, dhr, risk analysis and servicemax, the root cause of why the customer was experiencing carryover was due to air pockets/bubbles in the fluidics system.Air in the fluidics system can contribute to factors like flow instability which may lead to inaccurate results.The fse (field service engineer) confirmed the issue then purged the filter, refilled the flow cell, checked the v8 operation and the sit flush.No parts were requested for evaluation because no parts were replaced.After the repair the instrument was tested and was performing as expected.Although the reported carryover complaint was from patient samples, no patient was treated nor harmed from incorrect results.The results were captured prior to any diagnosis decision and was reported to bd as not expected.Proper purging of the fluidic filter and system can be found under ¿performing monthly cleaning procedure¿ in the user guide; bd facslyric¿ clinical system instructions for use, #23-19938-02 rev 01, page 177.After the repair, the instrument was rebooted, tested and functioning as expected.The safety risk is moderate, s3, and there was no impact to patient health or safety.Service max review: review of related work order #: (b)(4), case # (b)(4).Install date: 19jul2019.Defective part number: n/a.Work order notes: subject / reported: request for service.Problem description: carry over.Work performed: purged sheath filter.Refilled flow cell.Verified v8 operation.Verified sit flush.Tested carryover with beads.Ran pqc.Cause: air in system.Solution: all tests passed.Returned sample evaluation: a return sample was not requested because no parts were replaced.Risk analysis: risk management file part # 10000063058, rev.03/vers.X, bd facslyric system risk analysis was reviewed.No new hazards have been identified and the current mitigation is sufficient.Hazard(s) identified? yes.No.Tfs: (b)(4).Id: (b)(4).Reg status: ivd; ruo.Hazard: potential incorrect results /instrument temporarily inoperable.Source: fluidics fmea.Cause: 1.Sit flush between each tube/well acquisition may dislodge air bubble.2.Leak in degasser penetrations and/or rtv lid seal.3.Insufficient degasser capacity for given environmental conditions.4.Bubbles in sheath fluid.Harmful effects: 1.Field service visit required.2.Delay in results.3.Potential incorrect results.Risk control: implementation of sheath filter in sheath path before flow cell.Implementation of higher efficiency degasser unit.Feedback control on both differential and static transducers historically robust assembly procedures.Req link (tfs id): na.Implementation verification: libivd-se-15-84ar.Effectiveness verification: libivd-se-15-84ar.Propabiltiy: 1.Severity: 3.Risk index: 3.Residual risk evaluation: a.New hazards: none.Mitigation(s) sufficient? yes.No.Root cause: based on the investigation results the root cause was due to air found in the fluidics system.Conclusion: based on the investigation results, the root cause of the customer experiencing carryover during data acquisition of the facslyric, was due to air pockets/bubbles in the fluidics system.The fse confirmed the issue and purged air bubbles out of the system.After the repair, the instrument was rebooted, tested, and functioning as expected.No one was harmed or injured, and no medical diagnosis was performed due to the erroneous results.The safety risk is moderate, s3, and there was no impact to patient health or safety.H3 other text : see h.10.
|