|
No conclusions can be made.The patient's attorney alleges adverse patient outcome associated with the hernia mesh used to treat the patient.The patient's attorney alleges that the patient had subsequent surgical intervention; however, no details have been provided.No lot number has been provided; therefore, a review of the manufacturing records is not possible.Should additional information be provided, a supplemental emdr will be submitted.
|
|
No conclusions can be made.The patient's attorney alleges adverse patient outcome associated with the hernia mesh used to treat the patient.The patient's attorney alleges that the patient had subsequent surgical intervention; however, no details have been provided.No lot number has been provided; therefore, a review of the manufacturing records is not possible.Addendum: this supplemental emdr is submitted to document additional information provided.Root cause is inconclusive, no conclusion can be made as to the extent to which the implant may have caused or contributed to the patient's postoperative course.Note, the manufacturing date (15-sep-2011) is considered to be a best estimate.Updated fields: a2, a4, b3, b4, b5, b6, b7, d3, d4 (product catalog no., udi no., corporate lot.No., expiry date), d.6b (date of explant), g3, g6, h2, h4, h6, h10.Note: section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
|
|
Attorney alleges that the patient underwent surgery for implant of an unspecified bard/davol composix l/p on (b)(6) 2012.As reported, the patient is making a claim for an adverse patient outcome against the composix l/p.Attorney alleges that the patient had subsequent surgical intervention due to the hernia mesh device.It is also alleged that the patient experienced emotional distress and the device was defective.Addendum per additional information provided: (b)(6) 2012 ¿ patient was diagnosed with symptomatic ventral hernia thereby underwent laparoscopic repair with the implant of composix l/p mesh.Per operative notes, ¿hernia margins freshened up and a composix l/p mesh was placed into peritoneal cavity and secured using tackers.¿ (b)(6) 2019 ¿ patient was diagnosed with recurrent incarcerated ventral hernia thereby underwent open repair with the removal of mesh.Per operative notes, ¿recurrence of ventral hernia was noted.The omentum and mesh were removed along with sutures.¿.
|