C.R. BARD, INC. (BASD) -3006260740 POWERPORT DUO M.R.I. IMPLANTABLE PORT, CHRONOFLEX DUAL-LUMEN, 9.5F; PORT & CATHETER, IMPLANTED, SUBCUTANEOUS, INTRAVASCULAR
|
Back to Search Results |
|
Model Number 1829500 |
Device Problems
Partial Blockage (1065); Material Protrusion/Extrusion (2979)
|
Patient Problem
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
Event Date 04/01/2021 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
As the lot number for the device was provided, a review of the device history record is currently being performed.The device has been returned to the manufacturer for evaluation.The investigation of the reported event is currently underway.(expiry date:12/2021).
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that some time post port placement, the port septum allegedly dislodged.There was no reported patient injury.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
H10: manufacturing review: a complaint history review was performed.This is the third complaint reported for this lot number and the lot met all release criteria.A device history record review is required.Investigation summary: one powerport mri duo was returned for evaluation.Functional gross visual, microscopic evaluations were performed.The investigation is confirmed for the reported material protrusion and partially blockage issue as right port septa was partially dislodged while infusing and also the right port septum failed the mandrel test as the black mark was not fully inserted into the lumen.A definitive root cause could not be determined based upon the available information.Labeling review: a review of product labeling documentation (e.G., procedural instructions, indications, warnings, precautions, cautions, possible complications, contraindications, nursing guide, and unit label) did not find any product labeling inadequacy.H10: d4 (expiry date: 12/2021), g3, h6 (device, method).H11: section a through f ¿ the information provide by bd represents all the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant/reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that approximately three months post port placement, the port septum was allegedly dislodged.There was no reported patient injury.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that approximately three months post port placement, the port septum was allegedly dislodged.There was no reported patient injury.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
H10: manufacturing review: the device history records have been reviewed and this lot met all release criteria.There was nothing found to indicate there was a manufacturing related cause for this event.Investigation summary: one powerport mri duo was returned for evaluation.Functional gross visual, microscopic evaluations were performed.The investigation is inconclusive for the reported material protrusion and partially blockage issue as exact circumstance for the time of event was unknown.Further during functional evaluation both right and left port septum passed the mandrel test as the black mark was fully inserted into the lumen.A definitive root cause could not be determined based upon the provided information.Labeling review: a review of product labeling documentation (e.G., procedural instructions, indications, warnings, precautions, cautions, possible complications, contraindications, nursing guide, and unit label) did not find any product labeling inadequacy.H10: d4 (expiry date: 12/2021).H11: section a through f ¿ the information provide by bd represents all the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant/reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.H3 other text : see h10.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|