|
As reported, during a retrograde pyelogram and using a open-end ureteral catheter, the catheter broken off in the operating theater.The catheter was inserted through a cystoscope.When it was removed it was noted that the catheter appeared to have sheared off about a third along the shaft with a 5mm piece missing.All pieces were accounted for during the case, and the surgeon checked the bladder via cystoscope.No unintended part of the device remained inside the patient's body.No additional procedure was required due to this occurrence.No adverse effect was reported due to this occurrence.
|
|
Blank fields on this form indicate the information is unknown, unavailable, or unchanged.Event summary as reported, during a retrograde pyelogram and using an open-end ureteral catheter, the catheter broken off in the operating theater.The catheter was inserted through a cystoscope.When it was removed it was noted that the catheter appeared to have sheared off about a third along the shaft with a 5mm piece missing.All pieces were accounted for during the case, and the surgeon checked the bladder via cystoscope.No unintended part of the device remained inside the patient's body.No additional procedure was required due to this occurrence.No adverse effect was reported due to this occurrence.Investigation - evaluation reviews of the complaint history, device history record, instructions for use, specifications, and quality control procedures and a visual inspection of the device were conducted during the investigation.One used open-end ureteral catheter was returned outside of an open package in three segments measuring approximately 5mm, 20.5cm, and 51cm.The fracture points appeared smooth and did not appear to mate.A document-based investigation evaluation was performed.No related non-conformances were recorded, and there have been no other reported complaints for this lot number.The device history record review provides objective evidence that the device was manufactured to specification.There is no evidence of nonconforming devices from the complaint lot in house or in the field.A review of the device specification was performed, including quality control procedures.Cook has concluded that sufficient inspection activities are in place to assure functionality and device integrity prior to shipping.The device is provided with instructions for use which caution, ¿¿ avoid bending or kinking the catheter prior to placement.Doing so could damage the integrity of the catheter and result in patient injury.¿ if you encounter resistance while advancing or withdrawing the catheter, stop.Determine the cause of the resistance before proceeding.¿ do not withdraw catheter while deflected in cystoscope/endoscope.¿ based on the available information, cook has concluded that a cause for this incident could not be established.Cook will continue monitoring of similar complaints and has notified the appropriate personnel of this event.Per the quality engineering risk assessment, no further action is required.This report is required by the fda under 21 cfr part 803 and is based on unconfirmed information submitted by others.Neither the submission of this report nor any statement contained herein is intended to be an admission that any cook device is defective or malfunctioned, that a death or serious injury occurred, nor that any cook device caused, contributed to, or is likely to cause or contribute to a death or serious injury if a malfunction occurred.
|