| Model Number |
PVS27 |
| Medical Device Problem Codes |
Insufficient Device Problem Information (3190); Device Contaminated at the User Facility (4064)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
| Date of Event |
03/31/2021
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
The manufacturing and material records for the perceval heart valve, model # icv1211, s/n # (b)(4), as they pertain to the reported event, were retrieved and reviewed by quality engineering at livanova (b)(4).The results confirmed that this valve satisfied all material, visual, and performance standards required for a (model # icv1211) perceval heart valve at the time of manufacture and release.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
The manufacturer was notified that on (b)(6) 2021 a patient was intended to receive a perceval pvs27 as part of an avr.During the setup phase when the valve was being removed from the jar a hair was detected on the either the product or the container.As such the site did not use the valve.The procedure was extended by 30 minutes due to this issue.No further information was received.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
The manufacturer is providing a clarification received on the prolongation of the surgical procedure.It was confirmed that the delay in the procedure was caused by the need to implant a sutured valve.The remainder of the information and root cause analysis previously submitted remain unchanged.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
Regarding the delay in the procedure, it was clarified when the hair was found, a decision was made to implant a sutured valve.As such, the prolongation of the surgery resulted from the time to size and to suture the new valve.There were no difficulty to collapse the perceval valve.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
Per additional information received, 40 minutes were added for both surgery and x-clamp time included.Furthermore, according to the surgeon, it was confirmed that the hair was not inside the sealed container according to the surgeon, and the hair come probably from an operator during the valve preparation.The remainder of the information previously submitted remains unchanged.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
The device was returned to the manufacturer for investigation.After decontamination, a visual inspection was performed and confirmed that the valve had no pre-existing defects.It is possible to confirm the presence of a foreign material (reasonably an eyelash or an eyebrow) in the skirt in proximity of the seam for the tubular closure.The height of each leaflet was verified and resulted in compliance.Based on the additional information received from the field, it was confirmed that the contamination occurred during the preparation of the valve and before the implantation.As such, the root cause of the reported event is attributed to the user.No product deficiencies were identified during the investigations performed.No further investigation are deemed necessary at this time.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|