The reported event could not be confirmed, since the device was not returned for evaluation and no other additional information is available.More detailed information about the complaint event as well as the affected device must be available in order to determine the root cause of the complaint event.The device history record could not be reviewed because the affected lot number was not communicated.If any further information is provided, the investigation report will be updated.
|
The manufacturer became aware of a pmcf conducted by (b)(6) university hospital in (b)(6).The title of this report is a retrospective data collection of the treatment of humeral fractures with the t2 humeral nailing system which is associated with the stryker t2 humeral nailing system.This report includes research done on 95 patients from the period january 2011 to april 2019.It was not possible to ascertain specific device details or patient information from the report, or to match the events reported with previously reported complaints.Therefore, new complaints were initiated in the system for the post-operative complications mentioned in the report.This product inquiry addresses significant motor loss.The report states patient presented significant motor loss which could be due to postoperative nail extrusion (possibly surgical technique failure).
|