| Model Number |
110026108 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Improper or Incorrect Procedure or Method (2017)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
Insufficient Information (4580)
|
| Date of Event |
03/30/2021
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Malfunction
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
It has been indicated that the device will not be returned to us, as it remains implanted.Device used out of specifications.No patient injury.To complete our investigations, we requested additional information.Response received on 03 may 2021 and reassessment of the incident: "foreign body retained? yes" - did the patient retain a piece of anchor? yes.The patient retained a piece of the anchor.Half of the anchor is still in.Or the anchor was implanted without being broken? no.The anchor was implanted and it broke during implantation."both sutures broke off implant once item was inserted into patient's talus": to be able to analyze this incident, please report on the circumstance when the event occurred.When screwing in the implant the sutures got shredded and broke off.It looked like the sutures were grinded by the threads of the anchor.Did a delay in the procedure over 30 minutes occur that was related to the event? no.No defective product returned: do you have image (x-ray, mri, etc.) and/or photos of the sutures broken for analyze? no.Unable to return product because surgeon was unable to take broken implant out of patient without causing damage.Using the fixit on the talus / foot bone is out of indication: how was the fixit anchor used in this zone? the 4.5 tcp anchor was used as part of our "quattro brace" construct for lateral ankle instability repair."the patient retained a piece of the anchor.Half of the anchor is still in": did the surgeon use another anchor to complete surgery? no.According to the surgeon, did the piece of anchor in the patient would be likely to cause or contribute to serious injury? the surgeon is concerned that the half of the anchor that is still in patient is unstable and will ultimately fail.These first elements are being analysed.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
(b)(4).Event occured in (b)(6)/ usa - complaint description: both sutures broke off implant once item was inserted into patient's talus.Item name: compositcp 4.5mm two #2 bband, item number: 110026108, lot number: 183502.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
It has been indicated that the device will not be returned to us, as it remains implanted.Device used out of specifications.No patient injury.To complete our investigations, we requested additional information.Response received on 03 may 2021 and reassessment of the incident: "foreign body retained? yes" - did the patient retain a piece of anchor? yes.The patient retained a piece of the anchor.Half of the anchor is still in.Or the anchor was implanted without being broken? no.The anchor was implanted and it broke during implantation."both sutures broke off implant once item was inserted into patient's talus": to be able to analyze this incident, please report on the circumstance when the event occurred.When screwing in the implant the sutures got shredded and broke off.It looked like the sutures were grinded by the threads of the anchor.Did a delay in the procedure over 30 minutes occur that was related to the event? no.No defective product returned: do you have image (x-ray, mri, etc.) and/or photos of the sutures broken for analyze? no.Unable to return product because surgeon was unable to take broken implant out of patient without causing damage.Using the fixit on the talus / foot bone is out of indication: how was the fixit anchor used in this zone? the 4.5 tcp anchor was used as part of our "quattro brace" construct for lateral ankle instability repair."the patient retained a piece of the anchor.Half of the anchor is still in": did the surgeon use another anchor to complete surgery? no.According to the surgeon, did the piece of anchor in the patient would be likely to cause or contribute to serious injury? the surgeon is concerned that the half of the anchor that is still in patient is unstable and will ultimately fail.These first elements are being analysed.Follow up 1.Result of compositcp 4.5mm investigations: no elements were returned to sbm and no photos were available.The anchors comply with manufacturing specifications, the plastification time and injection time were very stable, no material flow defect likely to degrade the material was encountered.The device was used outside its specifications.The medical device is intended to be used for reconstruction of the rotator cuff, and not to be implanted in a hard bone such as the talus.This indication is stipulated in the ifu / performance: "the compositcptm anchor systems in duosorb 30 are bioabsorbable.They serve as a support for healing of the rotator cuff tendons, which facilitates shoulder function recovery and reduces pain in patients".1st hypothesis: the punch tap was not used before the medical device was implanted.2nd hypothesis: the patient's bone is very hard, a size 5.5 should have been used.The expertise report was transmitted to our distributor.This complaint is closed.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
Fnc (b)(4).Event occured in (b)(6)/ usa - complaint description: both sutures broke off implant once item was inserted into patient's talus.Item name: compositcp 4.5mm two #2 bband.Item number: 110026108.Lot number: 183502.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
Fnc 2104/02183, event occured in englewood / usa.Complaint description: both sutures broke off implant once item was inserted into patient's talus.Item name: compositcp 4.5mm two #2 bband, item number: 110026108, lot number: 183502.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
It has been indicated that the device will not be returned to us, as it remains implanted.Device used out of specifications.No patient injury.To complete our investigations, we requested additional information.Response received on (b)(6) 2021 and reassessment of the incident: "foreign body retained? yes" - did the patient retain a piece of anchor? yes.The patient retained a piece of the anchor.Half of the anchor is still in.Or the anchor was implanted without being broken? no.The anchor was implanted and it broke during implantation."both sutures broke off implant once item was inserted into patient's talus": to be able to analyze this incident, please report on the circumstance when the event occurred.When screwing in the implant the sutures got shredded and broke off.It looked like the sutures were grinded by the threads of the anchor.Did a delay in the procedure over 30 minutes occur that was related to the event? no.No defective product returned: do you have image (x-ray, mri, etc.) and/or photos of the sutures broken for analyze? no.Unable to return product because surgeon was unable to take broken implant out of patient without causing damage.Using the fixit on the talus / foot bone is out of indication: how was the fixit anchor used in this zone? the 4.5 tcp anchor was used as part of our "quattro brace" construct for lateral ankle instability repair."the patient retained a piece of the anchor.Half of the anchor is still in": did the surgeon use another anchor to complete surgery? no.According to the surgeon, did the piece of anchor in the patient would be likely to cause or contribute to serious injury? the surgeon is concerned that the half of the anchor that is still in patient is unstable and will ultimately fail.These first elements are being analysed.Follow up 1 result of compositcp 4.5mm investigations: no elements were returned to sbm and no photos were available.The anchors comply with manufacturing specifications, the plastification time and injection time were very stable, no material flow defect likely to degrade the material was encountered.The device was used outside its specifications.The medical device is intended to be used for reconstruction of the rotator cuff, and not to be implanted in a hard bone such as the talus.This indication is stipulated in the ifu / performance: "the compositcptm anchor systems in duosorb 30 are bioabsorbable.They serve as a support for healing of the rotator cuff tendons, which facilitates shoulder function recovery and reduces pain in patients".1st hypothesis: the punch tap was not used before the medical device was implanted.2nd hypothesis: the patient's bone is very hard, a size 5.5 should have been used.The expertise report was transmitted to our distributor.This complaint is closed.Follow up 2 / correction - incident in us there was an error regarding the specifications: the medical device is indeed intended to be used for the talus as well - this indication is stipulated in the us ifu (ankle/foot).1st hypothesis: a punch tap was not used before implantation of the device.2nd hypothesis: the patient's bone is very hard, an anchor size 5.5 should have been used.The revised expertise report was transmitted to our distributor.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|