• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES EDWARDS SAPIEN 3 ULTRA TRANSCATHETER HEART VALVE; AORTIC VALVE, PROSTHESIS, PERCUTANEOUSLY DELIVERED

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES EDWARDS SAPIEN 3 ULTRA TRANSCATHETER HEART VALVE; AORTIC VALVE, PROSTHESIS, PERCUTANEOUSLY DELIVERED Back to Search Results
Model Number 9750CM26A
Device Problems Difficult to Remove (1528); Device Dislodged or Dislocated (2923)
Patient Problem Unspecified Vascular Problem (4441)
Event Date 04/08/2021
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
The investigation is ongoing.
 
Event Description
As reported by the field clinical specialist (fcs), during a tf viv tmvr procedure for a 26mm sapien 3 ultra valve in a 27mm surgical valve, wire was lost during the first valve alignment step.Recrossing the mitral valve was attempted, but unsuccessful.Upon removal of the sheath and delivery system as a unit, the esheath and delivery system with the valve 'separated' from one another.There was a common femoral vein injury (cfv); bleeding was not able to be controlled and a cutdown repair of the cfv was performed.There was no evidence of stent frame or esheath damage reported.After the vessel repair, a second valve, delivery system, and 14f esheath was opened and successful implanted.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
A supplemental mdr is being submitted for product device investigation result and correction of h6 for type of investigation, investigation findings and investigation conclusions has been updated.The commander delivery system was not returned to edwards lifesciences for evaluation.Without the device returned for evaluation, visual inspection, functional testing and dimensional analysis were unable to be completed.As no device was returned and there is no evidence to support a manufacturing/design defect potentially contributed to the complaint.All inspections are conducted on 100% of the units.Dhr review was unable to be performed as the device lot number was not provided.Lot history review was unable to be performed as the device lot number was not provided.The instruction for use (ifu) were reviewed for the commander delivery system, s3u commander preparation training manual, s3u commander procedural training manual, supplement to edwards sapien 3/sapien 3 ultra with the commander delivery valve-in-valve patient screening and procedural training manual (mitral position).No ifu/training deficiencies were identified.The procedural training manual provides guidance on thv retrieval back into sheath tip.Thv can be retrieved through sheath only before thv deployment (still crimped).Ensure the thv is centered on the flex tip.Ensure delivery system is locked.Verify the flex catheter is completely unflexed.Retract the thv and delivery system into the sheath ensuring the thv is completely inside the sheath and just past the sheath tip.Ensure the edwards logo on the sheath handle is facing upward.Withdraw the delivery system and sheath as a single unit completely from the arteriotomy while maintaining guidewire position.Do not re-use the sheath, thv or delivery system once thv is retrieved.Crimped thv aligned on balloon is larger than crimped thv off balloon.Take care if deciding to retrieve.Do not force the thv into the sheath.If resistance is felt, the thv may be caught on the sheath tip.Stop, advance thv past the sheath tip and ensure thv is centered on the flex tip.Rotate the delivery system before trying again.Retrievability is based on preclinical testing.Additionally, an assessment of the following is recommended prior to mitral valve-in-valve implantation with sapien 3 ultra.A bioprosthesis failure mode (regurgitation/stenosis), significant pre-existing paravalvular leakage, degree of leaflets calcification, presence of intracardiacmass, thrombus, or vegetation on leaflets, right atrium, left atrium or left ventricle (risk of embolization), rv function and pulmonary hypertension (increased procedural risk), lv function and apical aneurysm to determine appropriateness for transapical access, suitability for transseptal(ts) approach: inter-atrial septum anatomy; presence of devices precluding ts access (septal occluder; cavalfilter), risk of lvot obstruction and sizing confirmation.A review of the risk management documentation was performed, and the reported event is an anticipated risk of the transcatheter heart valve procedure, additional assessment of the failure mode is not required at this time.No evidence of product non-conformances or labeling/ifu inadequacies were identified in the evaluation.The risk of being unable to retrieve system with crimped/partially inflated thv and associated harms has been reduced as low as possible through design and manufacturing processes.Edwards has provided guidelines and instructions to the physicians in the ifu and training materials/refresher training on how to withdraw the valve through the sheath.Users are informed of the residual risks associated with use of the delivery system and sheath through the potential adverse events section in the instructions for use (ifu) and/or device training materials.The benefits of the system outweigh the risks associated with difficulty withdrawing the delivery system with a crimped thv.The complaints was unable to be confirmed.Due to the unavailability of returned device and/or applicable imagery, engineering was unable to perform any visual, functional, or dimensional analysis.Therefore, a manufacturing nonconformance was unable to be determined.A review of the ifu and training manuals revealed no deficiencies.Per the complaint description, "upon removal of the sheath and delivery system as a unit, the esheath and delivery system with the valve separated.It was suspected that the stent portion got stuck in the vessel tissue".It is possible that the patients vasculature was tortuous and calcified.If so, the potential interaction of the thv's stent and patient anatomy may have lead to the reported event of valve moving off of inflation balloon.However, due to the lack of device and patient imagery, a definitive root cause is unable to be determined at this time.In this case, available information suggests patient factors (calcification) may have contributed to the reported event.However, a definitive root cause was unable to be determined.Complaint histories for all reported events are reviewed against trending control limits monthly, and any excursions above the control limits are assessed and documented as part of this monthly review.No ifu/labeling/training manual inadequacies were identified.Therefore, no corrective or preventative action nor product risk assessment is required at this time.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
EDWARDS SAPIEN 3 ULTRA TRANSCATHETER HEART VALVE
Type of Device
AORTIC VALVE, PROSTHESIS, PERCUTANEOUSLY DELIVERED
Manufacturer (Section D)
EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES
1 edwards way
irvine CA 92614
MDR Report Key11777692
MDR Text Key249092664
Report Number2015691-2021-02804
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code NPU
Combination Product (y/n)N
PMA/PMN Number
P140031
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,health
Remedial Action Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 06/12/2021
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model Number9750CM26A
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 04/08/2021
Initial Date FDA Received05/05/2021
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received06/09/2021
Supplement Dates FDA Received06/11/2021
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
-
-