|
The investigation could not be completed; no conclusion could be drawn, as no product was received.Based on the information available, it has been determined that no corrective and/or preventative action is proposed.This complaint will be accounted for and monitored via post market surveillance activities.If additional information is made available, the investigation will be updated as applicable.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
|
It was reported that on an unknown date, during a routine incoming inspection of a loaner set, it was observed that the small universal chuck with t-handle was broken.There was no known patient or hospital involvement.This report is for one (1) small universal chuck with t-handle.This is report 1 of 1 for (b)(4).
|
|
Depuy synthes is submitting this report pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which depuy synthes has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by fda, depuy synthes or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, depuy synthes, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If the information is unknown, not available or does not apply, the section/field of the form is left blank.D9 h3, h6: part number: 393.105 lot number: 22p0699 manufacturing site: haegendorf release to warehouse date: 13 november 2019 a manufacturing record evaluation was performed for the finished device lot number, and no non-conformances were identified.Visual inspection: the small universal chuck with t-handle (p/n: 393.105, lot number: 22p0699) was received at us customer quality (cq).Visual inspection of the complaint device showed no damage or defects with the device.The chuck was able to open and close smoothly with no issues.Device failure/defect identified? yes dimensional inspection: a dimensional inspection was not performed since it was not applicable to the complaint condition.Document/specification review: current and manufactured were reviewed.No design issues or discrepancies were identified.Complaint confirmed? no investigation conclusion: this complaint is not confirmed as no damage or defects were observed with the device.The chuck was able to open and close smoothly with no issues.No definitive root cause could be determined based on the provided information.There was no indication that a design or manufacturing issue contributed to the complaint.Based on the investigation findings, it has been determined that no corrective and/or preventative action is proposed.Additional monitoring for any potential safety signals will be conducted through complaint trending and other post market safety surveillance activities.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|