|
C.R. BARD, INC. (BASD) -3006260740 POWERPORT DUO M.R.I. IMPLANTABLE PORT, CHRONOFLEX DUAL-LUMEN, 9.5F; PORT & CATHETER, IMPLANTED, SUBCUTANEOUS, INTRAVASCULAR
|
Back to Search Results |
|
| Model Number |
5829502 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Material Protrusion/Extrusion (2979)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
| Date of Event |
02/26/2021
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Malfunction
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Manufacturing review: the device history record review was performed for the reported lot number and this lot meets all release criteria.The manufacturing review did not indicate any possible manufacturing issue that could be related to the reported event.Investigation summary : the device was not returned for evaluation.Therefore, the reported material protrusion issues cannot be confirmed.Based upon the available information a definitive root cause could not be determined.Labeling review: a review of product labeling documentation (e.G.Procedural instructions, indications, warnings, precautions, cautions, possible complications, contraindications, nursing guide, and unit label) did not find any product labeling inadequacy.(expiry date: 05/2022).
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that post port placement, the device allegedly had a material protrusion.There was no reported patient injury.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that post port placement, the device allegedly had a material protrusion.There was no reported patient injury.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
H10: a voluntary recall has been initiated for the powerport tm duo m.R.I.Tm implantable port which was product catalog/lot number specific.Reportedly, the powerport duo m.R.I.Implantable ports are having difficulty in flushing, infusion, and/or aspiration, and septum dislodgements during use.As a result of the field action, this event is being reported as a malfunction reportable event.H10: manufacturing review: a complaint history review was performed.This is the thirty second complaint reported for this product/lot number combination.The device history records were reviewed and there was nothing found to indicate there was a manufacturing related cause for these reports.Investigation summary : the device was not returned for evaluation.Therefore, the reported material protrusion issues cannot be confirmed.Based upon the available information a definitive root cause could not be determined.Labeling review: a review of product labeling documentation (e.G.Procedural instructions, indications, warnings, precautions, cautions, possible complications, contraindications, nursing guide, and unit label) did not find any product labeling inadequacy.H10:d4 (expiry date: 05/2022).H11:section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.H3 other text : device not returned.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|