| Catalog Number |
0112960 |
| Medical Device Problem Codes |
Defective Device (2588); Patient-Device Incompatibility (2682); Patient Device Interaction Problem (4001)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Codes |
Pain (1994); Hernia (2240); Insufficient Information (4580)
|
| Date of Event |
08/16/2019
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
No conclusions can be made.The patient's attorney alleges adverse patient outcome associated with the hernia mesh used to treat the patient.The patient's attorney alleges that the patient had subsequent surgical intervention; however, no details have been provided.No lot number has been provided; therefore, a review of the manufacturing records is not possible.Should additional information be provided, a supplemental emdr will be submitted.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
Attorney alleges that the patient underwent surgery for implant of an unspecified bard/davol perfix plug on (b)(6) 2012.As reported, the patient is making a claim for an adverse patient outcome against perfix plug.Attorney alleges that the patient had subsequent surgical intervention due to the hernia mesh device.It is also alleged that the patient experienced emotional distress and the device was defective.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
Attorney alleges that the patient underwent surgery for implant of an unspecified bard/davol perfix plug on (b)(6) 2012.As reported, the patient is making a claim for an adverse patient outcome against perfix plug.Attorney alleges that the patient had subsequent surgical intervention due to the hernia mesh device.It is also alleged that the patient experienced emotional distress and the device was defective.Addendum per additional information provided:
(b)(6) 2012 ¿ patient was diagnosed with right direct inguinal hernia open repair with the implant of perfix plug.Per operative notes, ¿the area of direct hernia was noted and there was bulging in the direct canal.A medium sized perfix plug was placed inside the defect and overlay mesh was then fashioned and secured to the pubic tubercle using a suture.¿
(b)(6) 2019 ¿ patient had pain and diagnosed with bilateral inguinal hernia thereby underwent laparoscopic repair.Per operative notes, ¿the hernia sacs were swept off.A synthetic mesh was placed over each inguinal floor and secured two pubic symphysis using sutures.¿.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
No conclusions can be made.The patient's attorney alleges adverse patient outcome associated with the hernia mesh used to treat the patient.The patient's attorney alleges that the patient had subsequent surgical intervention; however, no details have been provided.No lot number has been provided; therefore, a review of the manufacturing records is not possible.Should additional information be provided, a supplemental emdr will be submitted.Addendum: this supplemental emdr is submitted to document additional information provided.Root cause is inconclusive, no conclusion can be made as to the extent to which the implant may have caused or contributed to the patient's postoperative course.Note, the manufacturing date (15-nov-2011) is considered to be a best estimate.Note: section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|