It has not been possible to further investigate or evaluate this alleged event based on the limited information and/or no device failure provided to date.Catalog # is unknown but referred to as celect.Occupation: non-healthcare professional.Catalog number and lot number are unknown, however, the alleged celect is manufactured and inspected according to specifications.No evidence to suggest that this device was not manufactured according to specifications and nothing indicates that the filter did not perform as intended, e.G.Intended for the prevention of recurrent pulmonary embolism (pe) via placement in the vena cava.Cook will reopen its investigation if further information is received warranting supplementation in accordance with 21 c.F.R.803.56.This report includes information known at this time.A follow-up medwatch report will be submitted if additional relevant information becomes available.
|
Patient allegedly received an implant on (b)(6) 2015 via the right internal jugular vein due to deep vein thrombosis (dvt) and pulmonary embolism (pe).Patient is alleging vena cava perforation.The patient further alleges stress, anxiety, weight gain, and "thoughts of what could happen." report from ct 2: "filter type: cook celect.Ivc stenosis: none.Filter position: below the renal veins.Filter migration: none.Filter fracture/bending: none.Filter tilt: none.Filter penetration: yes, see impressions.Other findings: none.Impressions: some of the filter struts have penetrated 4 mm through the wall of the ivc into the pericaval/mesenteric fat.".
|
G4: 510(k) - k171712.Investigation: investigation is reopened due to additional information provided.The reported allegations have been further investigated based on the information provided to date.The following allegations have been investigated: vena cava (vc) perforation, stress, anxiety, weight gain, worry.Filter interacts with ivc wall, e.G.Penetration/perforation/embedment.This may be either symptomatic or asymptomatic.Potential causes may include improper deployment; and (or) excessive force or manipulations near an in-situ filter (e.G., a surgical or endovascular procedure in the vicinity of a filter).Potential adverse events that may occur include, but are not limited to, the following: trauma to adjacent structures, vascular trauma, vena cava perforation, vena cava penetration.Unknown if the reported stress, anxiety, weight gain, and worry are directly related to the filter and unable to identify a corresponding failure mode at this point in time.20 devices in lot.No relevant notes on work order.The product is manufactured and inspected according to specifications.No evidence to suggest that this device was not manufactured according to specifications and nothing indicates that the filter did not perform as intended, e.G.Intended for the prevention of recurrent pulmonary embolism (pe) via placement in the vena cava.Cook will reopen its investigation if further information is received warranting supplementation in accordance with 21 c.F.R.803.56.This report includes information known at this time.A follow-up medwatch report will be submitted if additional relevant information become available.This report is required by the fda under 21 cfr part 803.This report is based on unconfirmed information submitted by others.Neither the submission of this report nor any statement made in it is intended to be an admission that any cook device is defective or malfunctioned, that a death or serious injury occurred, or that any cook device caused or contributed to, or is likely to cause or contribute to a death or serious injury if a malfunction occurred.
|