| Model Number |
8888145048 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Material Puncture/Hole (1504)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
Sepsis (2067)
|
| Date of Event |
03/18/2021
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
According to the reporter, during use, leakage was noted at the junction of the extension tube and bifurcate.The catheter was not repaired.Tego was not utilized.There was no luer adapter issue.The patient developed sepsis and got hospitalized.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
According to the reporter, during pre-dialysis, leakage was noted at the junction of the extension tube and bifurcate.Both gauzes (venous and arterial extension tube) had blood stain.The patient developed sepsis.The patient did not have sepsis before.The patient was hospitalized to resolve the issue.The catheter was replaced.Betadine and chloraprep were the cleaning agents used (typically utilized to clean the catheter in its entirety).No other topical agents were used for the catheter.Chlorhexidine impregnated dressing (wound dressing) was utilized and it included any cleaning agents or antimicrobial properties.The cleaning agents were allowed to dry thoroughly prior to dressing the area and prior to applying ointment to the area.The patient was not responsible for any type of catheter maintenance.The cleaning agents never switched over the life of the catheter and never mixed.The site never used s epsiderm to clean the catheter.There was no protocol change for cleaning agents used recently.The catheter was not repaired.Tego was not utilized.There was no luer adapter issue.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Additional information: b5, g3 medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
According to the reporter, during pre-dialysis, leakage was noted at the junction of the arterial port/extension tube and bifurcate where a hole observed.Both gauzes (venous and arterial extension tube) had blood stain.The patient developed sepsis.The patient did not have sepsis before.The patient was hospitalized to resolve the issue.The catheter was replaced with an av (arteriovenous) access.It was stated that the clamps were moved to a new location after each treatment.Betadine and chloraprep were the cleaning agents used (typically utilized to clean the catheter in its entirety).No other topical agents were used for the catheter.Chlorhexidine impregnated dressing (wound dressing) was utilized and it included any cleaning agents or antimicrobial properties.The cleaning agents were allowed to dry thoroughly prior to dressing the area and prior to applying ointment to the area.The patient was not responsible for any type of catheter maintenance.The cleaning agents never switched over the life of the catheter and never mixed.The site never used sepsiderm to clean the catheter.There was no protocol change for cleaning agents used recently.The catheter was not repaired.Tego was not utilized.There was no luer adapter issue.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|