| Model Number |
G19891 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Material Separation (1562)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
| Date of Event |
01/30/2021
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
A follow up report will be submitted should additional relevant information become available.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
As reported via user facility(uf) medwatch report number mw5100414, during attempted removal of a cook cervical ripening balloon w/stylet, the uterine balloon sheared off from the vaginal balloon.The nurse and the physician were unable to remove the deflated uterine balloon from the uterus.An epidural was placed, and the physician was able to remove the uterine balloon fragment.No harm was noted to the patient.Additional information has been requested regarding the patient and the event.At the time of this report, no further information has been provided.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Blank fields on this form indicate the information is unknown, unavailable, or unchanged.Additional information: b5.The event is currently under investigation.A follow-up report will be submitted upon receipt of additional information or completion of the investigation.This report is required by the fda under 21 cfr part 803.This report is based on unconfirmed information submitted by others.Neither the submission of this report nor any statement made in it is intended to be an admission that any cook device is defective or malfunctioned; that a death or serious injury occurred; or that any cook device caused or contributed to; or is likely to cause or contribute to a death or serious injury if a malfunction occurred.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
Additional information was provided on (b)(6) 2021: both the uterine and vaginal balloons were inflated to 80ml volumes.The balloon was placed at 13:33, and at 17:27 it broke without tension between the uterine and vaginal balloons.At 20:40 the post epidural provider manually removed the tip (uterine) portion of the balloon catheter.Patient was noted to be 2cm dilated and 40% effaced before removal.The balloon was unable to be deflated.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Event summary: as reported via user facility (uf) medwatch report number mw5100414, during attempted removal of a cook cervical ripening balloon w/stylet, the uterine balloon sheared off from the vaginal balloon.Both the uterine and vaginal balloons were inflated to 80ml volumes.The balloon was placed at 13:33, and at 17:27 it broke without tension between the uterine and vaginal balloons.At 20:40 the post epidural provider manually removed the tip (uterine) portion of the balloon catheter.Patient was noted to be 2cm dilated and 40% effaced before removal.The balloon was unable to be deflated.No harm was noted to the patient.Investigation - evaluation: reviews of the complaint history, device history record, instructions for use, and quality control procedures and a visual inspection of the device were conducted during the investigation.Three unopened devices and one opened device were received.The open device was received in two segments, with the point of fracture at the distal end of the proximal balloon.The fracture points appeared to match.The device appeared to have been torn apart.One unopened device was opened for investigation.A function test was performed, and no leaks were detected.The device was gently tugged on, both with balloons full and then empty.No issues were noted.A document-based investigation evaluation was performed.No related non-conformances were recorded, and there have been no other reported complaints for this lot number.The device history record review provides objective evidence that the device was manufactured to specification.There is no evidence of nonconforming devices from the complaint lot in house or in the field.A review of relevant manufacturing documents was conducted.No gaps in production or processing controls were noted.There is no indication that a design or process related failure mode contributed to the reported event.Review of production and quality documentation did not observe any specific issues with current manufacturing or quality controls that may have contributed to this incident.The device is provided with instructions for use which state, "upon removal from the package, inspect the product to ensure no damage has occurred." based on the available information, cook has concluded that the most probable cause for the reported event could not be determined.Cook will continue monitoring of similar complaints and has notified the appropriate personnel of this event.Per the quality engineering risk assessment, no further action is required.This report is required by the fda under 21 cfr part 803 and is based on unconfirmed information submitted by others.Neither the submission of this report nor any statement contained herein is intended to be an admission that any cook device is defective or malfunctioned, that a death or serious injury occurred, nor that any cook device caused, contributed to, or is likely to cause or contribute to a death or serious injury if a malfunction occurred.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
No additional information regarding the patient and/or event has been received since the previous medwatch report was sent.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|