|
This supplemental report is being submitted to provide the lm investigation.The legal manufacturer (lm) reviewed the content of this complaint for further investigation.The lm reports that the root cause could not be identified.The legal manufacturer provided the following possible cause for the reported event are presumed as follows: judging from the manufacturing year of the subject device, it is possible that the peeling was due to aging deterioration.Or, it is possible that the phenomenon occurred because an external force was applied to the subject device by strongly shaking it during re-processing or while it was normally used over a long period of times.The legal manufacturer checked the instruction manual and found the following description.Inspection of the endoscope: inspect the external surface of the entire insertion section including the bending section and the distal end for dents, bulges, swelling, scratches, holes, sagging, transformation, bends, adhesion of foreign bodies, missing parts, protruding objects, or other irregularities.As a result of the dhr review, it was confirmed that there was no abnormality in manufacturing, concession, and variation.
|