|
It was reported that during an acl procedure, while rasping the aperture of the femoral tunnel, the tip of the rasp broke off into the patient.All pieces were removed from patient.A change in the surgical technique was performed by the surgeon.No delay and no patient complications were reported.
|
|
Internal complaint reference: (b)(4).H3, h6: the reported device, used in treatment, was received for evaluation.There was a relationship found between the returned device and the reported incident.A review of the device history records showed there were no indications to suggest that the product did not meet manufacturing specification or would not be able to perform as intended.A complaint history review concluded this was an isolated event.The instructions for use was reviewed and found to include conditions of off label use and technique specifics, as well as precautions and warnings related to the use of the device.A review of risk management files found that the reported failure was documented appropriately.A visual inspection revealed the device was received outside of original packaging.The etched in markings were still legible, but visible use could be seen on the device handle.The distal tip of the device has become broken from the device.The complaint was confirmed.Factors, which could have contributed to the complaint event, include an application of unintended inappropriate or excessive force to the device.No containment or corrective actions are recommended at this time.
|