|
Product complaint # (b)(4).Information regarding patient weight, height, medical history, race, and ethnicity was not reported.Procode: krd/hcg.Expiration - date not available at the time of reporting.Initial reporter phone: (b)(6).The device is available to be returned for evaluation and testing.However, it has not been received to date as indicated as ¿other¿ in this section as the reason for non-evaluation.If the device returns, a device investigation will be performed.Device manufacture date - not available at the time of reporting.The company is seeking this information through the event investigation.A supplemental report will be submitted if new facts arise which materially alter information submitted in a previous mdr report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial report, a follow-up report will be filed as appropriate.
|
|
A report from the field indicated that during an aneurysm coil embolization procedure, a 5mm x 7cm cashmere 14 (crc14050730/s14303) coil failed to return to the introducer sheath (i.E., rezipped).The physician replaced the coil to continue the operation.Then, a 7mm x 25cm orbit galaxy tdl complex frame (640cr0725/30451951) coil unintendedly detached before arriving to the target position.The physician utilized a microwire to push the prematurely detached coil into the target aneurysm.No patient complications occurred as a result of the event.No further information was provided at the time of complaint initiation.
|
|
Product complaint #: (b)(4).A supplemental report will be submitted if new facts arise which materially alter information submitted in a previous mdr report.Complaint conclusion: a report from the field indicated that during an aneurysm coil embolization procedure, a 5mm x 7cm cashmere 14 (crc14050730/s14303) coil failed to return to the introducer sheath (i.E., rezipped).The physician replaced the coil to continue the operation.Then, a 7mm x 25cm orbit galaxy tdl complex frame (640cr0725/30451951) coil unintendedly detached before arriving to the target position.The physician utilized a microwire to push the prematurely detached coil into the target aneurysm.No patient complications occurred as a result of the event.Additional event information received on 27 may 2021 indicated that the target aneurysm was located at the right ophthalmic artery of the internal carotid artery (ica).There was ¿normal¿ physiological curvature of the vessel; there was no calcification.The diameter of the right anterior genu (c3) intracavernous ica was 4.2mm.A prowler-14 150/50cm (606151x/30411329) microcatheter was used in conjunction with the orbit galaxy complaint coil.The coil unintendedly detached in the prowler-14 microcatheter, approximately 100cm from the proximal end.There was no resistance/friction encountered during advancement of the coil through the microcatheter.The device did not become stuck in the catheter at any time.There was a sufficient flush maintained through the devices.The procedure was delayed 20 minutes due to the event.Additional event information received on 24 jun 2021 indicated that the 20-minute procedural delay was not considered clinically significant and did not result in any injury to the patient.It was reported that the surgeon is highly experienced and resolved the problem caused by the coils.The same prowler 14 microcatheter was used to complete the procedure.No further information was provided.One non-sterile unit og tdl cmplx frame coil 7x25 was received at cerenovus inside of a pouch for evaluation.The device was inspected, and it was found kinked at 19 inches and 34 inches.No other damages or anomalies were observed during the visual analysis.The device was inspected under microscope and it was found that the embolic coil was not returned for evaluation.Also, the support coil was inspected under microscope and it was found in good normal conditions.A manufacturing record evaluation was performed for the finished device 30451951 number, and no non-conformances related to the reported complaint condition were identified premature detachment requiring additional intervention is a known potential procedural complication associated with the orbit galaxy coil.With the information provided, it is not possible to determine the root cause of the unintended detachment.However, there are clinical and procedural factors including aneurysm/vessel characteristics, device selection, device interaction, and operator technique that may have contributed rather than the design or manufacture of the device.Excessive force applied to a coil through repeated coil deployments or manipulation can increase the possibility of unintended detachment.There was no report of any unusual resistance/friction that may have preceded the premature detachment.Cerenovus conducted visual and microscopic inspection.During the visual analysis of the og tdl cmplx frame coil 7x25 it was noted that the device has a kinked condition.During the microscopic inspection it was noted that the embolic coil was not returned for evaluation, also the support coil was inspected, and no damages or anomalies were observed on it.Since the embolic coil was not returned for evaluation with the rest of the device, the customer complaint regarding ¿coil - premature detachment-in microcatheter¿ was confirmed, however it cannot determine the exact time when this occurs.A manufacturing record evaluation was performed, and no non-conformances related to the reported complaint condition were identified.It should be noted that product failure is multifactorial.The instructions for use (ifu) do contain the following precautions: ¿ repositioning the infusion catheter while the coil is deployed can lead to damage and/or premature detachment of the coil.¿ never advance, withdraw, or torque the delivery tube against resistance without first determining the cause of resistance under fluoroscopy.Manipulation of the delivery tube against resistance can cause damage and/or premature detachment of the coil.If unusual friction is noted within the infusion catheter, remove the detachable coil system.If friction is noted with any subsequent detachable coil system, carefully examine the detachable coil system and the infusion catheter for possible damage.Replace both if necessary.The file will be re-reviewed if additional information is received at a later date.As part of cerenovus quality process all devices are manufactured, inspected, and released to approved specifications.As part of the post market surveillance program, information from this complaint is trended to identify statistical signals for consideration of further correction action.Since there was no evidence to suggest the event was related to a manufacturing or design issue, no corrective actions will be taken at this time.
|