H3, h6: the real intelligence robotic drill, pn: rob10013, sn: (b)(6) used for treatment was not returned to the designated complaint unit for evaluation, therefore a visual and functional inspection could not be performed.However, the case files were provided and reviewed to confirm the reported problem.Screenshots confirmed over-resected bone along the medial edge of the condyle, as well as the posterior end of the condyle.The checkpoints were verified to be on the bone in casevisualizer.Screenshots confirmed that the knee was in 10 degrees varus.This significant degree of varus could be indicative of osteophytes on the medial condyle because they tend to occur where there is excessive friction between the joint surfaces.A potential cause could be that the osteophytes were removed after femur free collection, which may have led to the over-resection (red) of the bone.The red bone is an area that is typically a softer bone, making the bone more susceptible to accidental resection when removing the osteophytes that are in proximity to this soft bone.Reference the cori user's manual for osteophyte removal prior to registration with the cori system.Before collecting range of motion and free collection data, prominent spurs or osteophytes are to be removed.Remove intracondylar, medial, and lateral osteophytes to avoid impingement with the tibial spine or cruciate ligaments, as well as peripheral osteophytes that may interfere with the collateral ligaments and capsule.It is crucial that all osteophytes are removed from the entire medial edge of both the femur and tibia, in order to assess joint stability reliably.It was confirmed that the diameter of the anterior lug hole appeared larger in the bone model refinement screenshots.Further review of the screenshots found that the bone model refinement had occurred right after the burring of the lug hole.It appears there was some red around the interior perimeter of the lug hole, indicating the hole was burred outside of what was planned.The user then went in to bone model refinement again, where the bur and the guard had swept the interior of the lug hole, which made the lug hole white.A potential cause of the larger lug hole could be a situation where the surgeon was quickly moving the active bur around the lug hole site and the bur did not have enough time to retract, thus creating a larger lug hole than planned.Or the drill could have been rammed into the hole with the guard.According to the cori user's manual, the user should avoid quick passes of the tool over the surface.To remove bulk bone, a slow, methodic ¿plunge and drag motion¿ through to the cortical layer, will remove bone with the greatest efficiency.The bur remains protruded only until it has reached the target surface, and the bur exposure actively adjusts so that cutting beyond the target surface is minimized.As described in the cori user's manual, the bone model refinement stage presents a model of the operative surface where the bur tip or the guard (in exposure mode and not rotating) of the robotic drill is moved over the bone surface where layers of bone are removed from the virtual model to depict the current state of the bone surface.As the robotic drill tip is moved over the bone surface, layers of bone are removed from the on-screen model.Therefore, the virtual "refining" of the anterior lug hole turned the red bone to white bone to reflect the updated physical bone model on the screen.Based on the information provided, the medical/clinical investigation concluded the following: the patient¿s poor bone quality, user technique and/or procedural variance could not be ruled out as possible contributing factors to the reported events.Further patient impact and/or medical assessment could not be rendered at this time.Should additional clinical documentation become available in the future, the clinical/medical task may be re-evaluated.A review of manufacturing records indicate the software met all specifications upon release into distribution.A complaint history review found similar reports, this issue will continue to be monitored.This situation is captured in the risk assessment released at the time of the complaint.As a result of these findings, it was determined that the software functioned as intended; no defect of the system occurred.Based on the investigation, no containment or corrective actions are recommended at this time.
|