The reported event could be confirmed, since physical evaluation revealed a broken off tip.The drilling spiral of the drill returned is completely sheared off.The broken off piece was not returned.According to the appearance of the breakage surface, the drill broke in a (forced) brittle manner due to overload, most likely by bending stresses.The breakage may be caused by drilling under misalignment and / or contact with a hard object.Based on the above facts the root cause of the reported event is not related to a deficiency of the device but is rather linked to improper handling by the user.The brochure ¿instructions for cleaning, sterilization, inspection and maintenance¿ help to determine whether an instrument is in good condition or must be replaced due to excessive wear or obvious defects.Broken drills, with remaining parts in patient, are known from previous cases and were evaluated by a medical expert.Excerpts from the clinical assessment of a medical expert in a similar case: ¿an intra-operative breakage of a drill is a rare but common complication and well known to an experienced user.It is caused by twisting the drill and too much bending.Breakage caused by material defect is very rare in current manufacturing technology.It is of interest whether a broken part of a drill can be left in the bone or should be retrieved; also in the case that greater harm to the bone would be done.It is well known to an expert user that a broken part of a drill which is completely embedded in the bone normally does not cause any harm.In absence of a nickel allergy, the material used for the drill does not cause any local or systemic incompatibility.[¿] therefore, no further surgical procedures in this special case are required.[¿]¿ a review of the device history for the reported lot did not indicate any abnormalities.No corrective actions are required at this time.A review of the labeling did not indicate any abnormalities.No indications of material, manufacturing or design related problems were found during the investigation.However, it lies in the responsibility of the treating surgeon to leave or to remove the broken off part and according to details available ¿¿finally it was possible to remove the broken piece¿¿.In addition, the risk has been evaluated and is adequately covered in the current valid risk file.In case substantive information will become available in future that suggests otherwise we reserve the right to reopen the case.
|