• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: COVIDIEN 3.5FR URETHANE UMB CATH; CATHETER, UMBILICAL ARTERY

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

COVIDIEN 3.5FR URETHANE UMB CATH; CATHETER, UMBILICAL ARTERY Back to Search Results
Model Number 8888160333
Device Problem Fluid/Blood Leak (1250)
Patient Problem No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Event Date 05/19/2021
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
The incident sample has been requested but to date has not been received for evaluation.  if the sample is received, or if additional information pertinent to the incident is obtained a follow-up report will be submitted.  as part of our manufacturing process, all device history records are reviewed and approved by quality, prior to release of product.
 
Event Description
Customer reports: the device was leaking at the junction between the hub and tubing during use on a patient.The device began leaking approximately 20 minutes into use.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Additional information: h4 device manufacture date; h6 health effect - clinical code; h6 type of investigation.Investigation summary: a device history record (dhr) review of the lot number revealed no discrepancies that may have contributed to the reported condition.All quality assurance testing performed during manufacturing was acceptable.The quality assurance review of the visual, physical, and dimensional evaluation results concludes the product met specification requirements.In addition, all dhrs were reviewed prior to the product release to confirm all requirements were met.The physical sample involved was not returned for evaluation; however, one photo was provided for review.According to the photo, a catheter with a syringe was observed and indicates where the leak could have been.A leak is not able to be identified in the photo provided.Therefore, the reported issue was not confirmed.Based on the investigation, an exact root cause could not be determined.However, as part of continuous improvements, a corrective action was opened.Actions are designed to prevent the reoccurrence of the reported condition.It must be noted that in-process controls (such as personnel training, incoming quality acceptance testing for raw material, 100% in process visual inspection and visual acceptance sampling are performed in the plant) are in place to prevent nonconforming product from leaving the manufacturing operations.This complaint will be used for tracking and trending purposes.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Additional information: h2, h3, h6.Investigation conclusion: the reported complaint stated that the device was leaking at the junction between the hub and tubing during use on a patient.The device began leaking approximately 20 minutes into use.The device history record (dhr) was reviewed, and no discrepancies that may have contributed to the reported condition.All quality assurance testing performed during manufacturing was acceptable.The quality assurance review of the visual, physical, and dimensional evaluation results concludes the product met specification requirements.In addition, all dhrs were reviewed prior to the product release to confirm all requirements were met.A total of six (6) unused products were returned for evaluation.Visual inspection showed no signs of use.Functional evaluation performed via leak test and all six samples passed.The returned products functioned as intended with no fault found; therefore, the reported product failure was not confirmed.It can be concluded that this complaint could be related with a customer perception since the defect reported was not confirmed per sample evaluation analysis.According to the information above, customer perception cause is determined as the most probable root cause.Additionally, based on the investigation performed there are controls in place to detect this type of failure mode such as leak test and 100% occlusion tests.It must be noted that in-process controls (such as personnel training, incoming quality acceptance testing for raw material, 100% in process visual inspection and visual acceptance sampling are performed in the plant) are in place to prevent nonconforming product from leaving the manufacturing operations.Additional action will not be taken at this time.This complaint will be used for tracking and trending purposes.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
3.5FR URETHANE UMB CATH
Type of Device
CATHETER, UMBILICAL ARTERY
Manufacturer (Section D)
COVIDIEN
edificio b20 calle #2 zona fra
alajuela
CS 
Manufacturer (Section G)
COVIDIEN
edificio b20 calle #2 zona fra
alajuela
CS  
Manufacturer Contact
jill saraiva
15 hampshire street
mansfield, MA 02048
5086183640
MDR Report Key11855578
MDR Text Key255068888
Report Number3009211636-2021-00747
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code FOS
UDI-Device Identifier20884527005113
UDI-Public20884527005113
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeHK
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Foreign,User Facility,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date 12/30/2021
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received05/20/2021
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Model Number8888160333
Device Catalogue Number8888160333
Device Lot Number1829700083
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Date Manufacturer Received05/20/2021
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured11/01/2018
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Type of Device Usage A
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-