Coloplast has not been provided any corroborating evidence to verify the information contained in this report.The lot # was reviewed for complaint trend, nonconforming report and capa.Devices met specification prior to release and no trends were noted.Without the benefit of examination and testing, coloplast is precluded from commenting on the condition of the device or the cause of the occurrence.Should additional facts prompt us to alter or supplement any information or conclusions contained in the original mdr or in any prior supplemental reports, a follow-up report will be submitted.
|
As reported to coloplast, though not verified, the patient with this device required excision of restorelle directfix anterior, new placement of restorelle directfix anterior for anterior repair, bilateral sacrospinous fixation with prolene sutures, lysis of adhesions, repair of intraoperative right bladder wall perforation, temporary (intraoperative) bilateral urethral stent placement, left ureteral stent removal, cystoscopy x 3.Intraoperative findings: grade 2 cystocele, intraoperative right bladder wall perforation (repaired), due to extensive dissection temporary bilateral urethral stents were placed (left removed, right remains intact).No obvious indication for initial restorelle directfix anterior failure.Due to bladder thinning new placement of restorelle directfix anterior was deemed appropriate.
|