|
|
| Catalog Number |
0123810 |
| Medical Device Problem Codes |
Defective Device (2588); Patient-Device Incompatibility (2682); Patient Device Interaction Problem (4001)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Codes |
Adhesion(s) (1695); Pain (1994); Hernia (2240); Obstruction/Occlusion (2422); Insufficient Information (4580)
|
| Date of Event |
07/07/2017
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
No conclusions can be made.The patient's attorney alleges "past, present, and future damages, including but not limited to, mental and physical pain and suffering for severe and permanent personal injuries sustained by the patient"; however, no details have been provided.No lot number has been provided; therefore, a review of the manufacturing records is not possible.This emdr represents the bard/davol composix mesh e/x (device #1).An additional emdr was submitted to represent the bard/davol mesh ¿ ventralex (device #2).Should additional information be provided, a supplemental emdr will be submitted.Not returned.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
Attorney alleges that the patient underwent surgery for implant of unspecified bard/davol composix e/x and ventralex on (b)(6) 2011 and/or (b)(6) 2013.As reported, the patient is making a claim for an adverse patient outcome against both devices.Attorney alleges that the patient sustained unspecified injuries on (b)(6) 2011.Attorney alleges general allegations for "past, present, and future damages, including but not limited to, mental and physical pain and suffering for severe and permanent personal injuries sustained by the patient.¿ it is also alleged that the patient experienced emotional distress and the device was defective.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
No conclusions can be made.The patient's attorney alleges "past, present, and future damages, including but not limited to, mental and physical pain and suffering for severe and permanent personal injuries sustained by the patient"; however, no details have been provided.No lot number has been provided; therefore, a review of the manufacturing records is not possible.Addendum: this supplemental emdr is submitted to document additional information provided.Root cause is inconclusive; no conclusion can be made as to the extent to which the implant may have caused or contributed to the patient's postoperative course.Updated fields: a2, b2, b3, b4, b5, b7, d3, d4 (product catalog no., udi no., corporate lot.No.,), d.6a (date of implant), d.6b (date of explant), g3, g6, h2, h6, h10.This emdr represents the bard/davol composix mesh e/x (device #1).An additional emdr was submitted to represent the bard/davol mesh ¿ ventralex (device #2).Note: section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
Attorney alleges that the patient underwent surgery for implant of unspecified bard/davol composix e/x and ventralex on (b)(6) 2011 and/or (b)(6) 2013.As reported, the patient is making a claim for an adverse patient outcome against both devices.Attorney alleges that the patient sustained unspecified injuries on (b)(6) 2011.Attorney alleges general allegations for "past, present, and future damages, including but not limited to, mental and physical pain and suffering for severe and permanent personal injuries sustained by the patient.¿ it is also alleged that the patient experienced emotional distress and the device was defective.Addendum per additional information provided: (b)(6) 2011 ¿ patient was diagnosed with incisional hernia thereby underwent open repair with the implant of composix e/x mesh (device #1).Per operative notes, ¿the previous synthetic mesh was noted.A composix e/x mesh (device #1) mesh was placed underlay to previous synthetic mesh rim using sutures.¿ (b)(6) 2013 ¿ patient was diagnosed with incisional hernia thereby underwent open repair with the implant of ventralex (device #2).Per operative notes, ¿the bowel was freed up from the fascial edges and rim of mesh.The ventralex mesh (device #2) with straps was placed and sutured to facial rim.¿ (b)(6) 2017 - patient was diagnosed with high grade bowel obstruction thereby underwent partial removal of mesh (device #1, #2).Per operative notes, ¿the small bowel adherent with the mesh was lysed.A portion of mesh (device #1, #2) was excised.The gallbladder has chronic inflammation was removed and a synthetic mesh was placed in underlay fashion using sutures.¿ (b)(6) 2019 ¿ patient was diagnosed with incisional hernia thereby underwent open repair.Per operative notes, ¿two defects was encountered was related to previous mesh and between two pieces of mesh.A biologic mesh was placed in underlay fashion using sutures.¿ (b)(6) 2020 ¿ patient was diagnosed with recurrent incisional hernia with bowel obstruction thereby underwent open repair with the removal of mesh (device #1, #2) and implant of ventrio st mesh (device #3).Per operative notes, ¿the defect just to the right of midline in the supraumbilical position and some of the mesh was noted.Adhesions to the bowel and mesh were lysed.On left lateral side, the defect was found below the previous fascial closure with mesh.Multiple layers of mesh in bilateral subcostal and some mesh (device #1, #2) incorporated to external oblique was excised.Then, ventrio st mesh (device #3) was placed on defect and secured using sutures.¿ (b)(6) 2021 ¿ patient was diagnosed with spigelian type hernia in left flank thereby underwent open repair.Per operative notes, ¿adhesions were freed up from bowel and heavily reinforced with mesh.There was some mesh inferiorly and superiorly.The prolene sutures thinned out because of body habitus and intraabdominal pressure which eventuated the recurrence.The small bowel was resected and anastomosis done.A biological mesh was placed and sutured.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|