|
It was reported that a revision surgery was performed a fracture of the femur, from which the patient suffered after a fall.The device, used in treatment was not returned for evaluation, therefore further analysis was not possible.Therefore, the relationship between the reported event and the device cannot be confirmed.However, based on the communicated information, the product history could be reviewed.The production documentation was reviewed.There are no indications that the part failed to match specification at the time of manufacturing.There were no further complaints reported for the batch in scope.The failure mode and the severity are covered through the corresponding risk management files.The ifu lit.No.12.23, ed.05/16 lists bone fracture as a possible side effect.A medical investigation concludes that the femoral fracture and the subsequent revision were a result of the patient's fall.The issue is not associated with a mal-performance of the device.The root cause of the femoral fracture is associated with the patients fall and not with a malperformance of the implant.To date, further actions are not deemed necessary.Should additional information become available, this complaint will be reassessed.Smith and nephew will monitor this device for further similar issues.
|