• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: COOK INC NESTER PLATINUM EMBOLIZATION COIL; KRD DEVICE, EMBOLIZATION, VASCULAR

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

COOK INC NESTER PLATINUM EMBOLIZATION COIL; KRD DEVICE, EMBOLIZATION, VASCULAR Back to Search Results
Model Number N/A
Medical Device Problem Codes Inadequacy of Device Shape and/or Size (1583); Stretched (1601)
Health Effect - Clinical Code No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Date of Event 05/12/2021
Type of Reportable Event Serious Injury
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Occupation: lab manager.This report includes information known at this time.A follow up report will be submitted should additional relevant information become available.
 
Event or Problem Description
It was reported a female patient required placement of a nester platinum embolization coil for coiling of a fistula near the brachial artery.After the coil was deployed in the patient, it was noted the coil did not curl and remained straight.The device was retrieved "via a small cutdown" with a clamp and hemostat.No additional coils were placed.It was noted that upon removal from the patient, the coil "looked more like a bow." no other adverse effects were reported for this incident.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Investigation ¿ evaluation.It was reported by (b)(6) of (b)(6) in the united states that on (b)(6) 2021 a nester platinum embolization coil (rpn: mwce-35-14-12-nester; lot# 9246011) did not curl.The device was required for coiling of a fistula near the brachial artery.After the coil was deployed in the patient, it was noted the coil did not curl and remained straight.The device was retrieved "via a small cutdown" with a clamp and hemostat.No additional coils were placed.It was noted that when the coil was removed from the patient it still did not curl and ¿looked more like a bow¿.No other adverse effects were reported for this incident.Reviews of the complaint history, device history record (dhr), quality control, and instructions for use (ifu), as well as personnel interview were conducted during the investigation.The complaint device was not returned; therefore, no physical examinations could be performed.However, a document-based investigation evaluation was performed.A review of the device master record (dmr) concluded that sufficient inspection activities are in place to identify this failure mode prior to distribution a review of the dhr for the reported complaint device lot (9246011) revealed no recorded non-conformances relevant to the failure mode.A database search did not identify any other events associated with the reported device lot.Based on the available information, cook has concluded that there is no evidence suggesting nonconforming product exists either in house or in field.Cook also reviewed product labeling.The ifu supplied with the device states the following in consideration of the reported failure mode: "how supplied upon removal from package, inspect the product to ensure no damage has occurred." based on the available information, no product returned, and the results of the investigation, cook has concluded that component failure unrelated to manufacturing or design deficiencies contributed to this incident.The appropriate personnel have been notified.Cook will continue to monitor for similar complaints.Per the risk assessment no further action is required.This report is required by the fda under 21 cfr part 803 and is based on unconfirmed information submitted by others.Neither the submission of this report nor any statement contained herein is intended to be an admission that any cook device is defective or malfunctioned, that a death or serious injury occurred, nor that any cook device caused, contributed to, or is likely to cause or contribute to a death or serious injury if a malfunction occurred.
 
Event or Problem Description
No additional information regarding the patient and/or event has been received since the previous medwatch report was sent.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
NESTER PLATINUM EMBOLIZATION COIL
Common Device Name
KRD DEVICE, EMBOLIZATION, VASCULAR
Manufacturer (Section D)
COOK INC
750 daniels way
bloomington IN 47404
Manufacturer (Section G)
COOK INC
750 daniels way
bloomington IN 47404
Manufacturer Contact
jason crouch
750 daniels way
bloomington, IN 47404
8123392235
MDR Report Key11893384
Report Number1820334-2021-01410
Device Sequence Number14520056
Product Code KRD
UDI-Device Identifier00827002269927
UDI-Public(01)00827002269927(17)231031(10)9246011
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter StateMD
Initial Reporter CountryUS
PMA/510(K) Number
K153778
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)N
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source User Facility,Company Representative
Initial Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 03/17/2022
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Expiration Date10/31/2023
Device Model NumberN/A
Device Catalogue NumberMWCE-35-14-12-NESTER
Device Lot Number9246011
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Type of Report(Section G)Initial
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 05/13/2021
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer02/22/2022
Initial Report FDA Received Date05/27/2021
Supplement Report FDA Received Date03/18/2022
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured10/31/2018
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Outcome Attributed to Adverse Event Required Intervention;
Patient Age62 YR
Patient SexFemale
-
-